Recent content by metricman

  1. M

    450 NE 3 1/4 stick to factory or load for it

    will be interested to know how these new loads compare to your Re 15 loads
  2. M

    Reloading different bullet brands of the same weight with one type of powder

    Sage advice
  3. M

    Cannelure not right for a cartridge

    sir: your reply and insights are much appreciated
  4. M

    Cannelure not right for a cartridge

    very enlightening. i have the ch tool so guess i'm out of luck with the more heavily jacketed bullets as i doubt the tool will take the increased leverage you describe
  5. M

    Cannelure not right for a cartridge

    couldn't get the c-h tool to make a dent in 500 grain woodleighs. as you say, the thickness and hardness of the jacket matters
  6. M

    Looking for Barnes load data for the 450 NE 3/14"

    Hornady manual lists their 350 gr bullets but not with the powders you mentioned.
  7. M

    9.3x62mm vs. .375 H&H Mag

    thank you
  8. M

    9.3x62mm vs. .375 H&H Mag

    as far as i am aware, john barsness is not late metricman
  9. M

    9.3x62mm vs. .375 H&H Mag

    were those loads pressure tested or predicted? metricman
  10. M

    35 Whelen load data

    since different bullets have different constructions jacket alloy, bearing surface, etc., i would start with the data from whoever makes the bullets you are interested in using
  11. M

    9.3 Sisk

    that is my understanding as well
  12. M

    9.3x62 load

    that ought to do it you can get some sleep now
  13. M

    9.3x62 load

    that load exceeds data published in the nosler reloading manual no 7 (max 57 gr)
  14. M

    9.3x62 load

    do you happen to have pressure data using RL 17?
  15. M

    Why not 30-06 paired with .416?

    why not indeed!
See more
 
Top