450/400 NE load data?

so far the only load data I can find for the 450/400 NE cartridge is in my Hornady book and the info is pretty limited in there.

does any one have any load data for the 450/400 NE cartridge? pet loads would be welcome as well!

the gun im looking at is regulated to the hornady DGX/DGS cartridge but im hoping to imitate it with Woodleigh bullets (i do not trust hornady DGX bullets).

thanks
-matt
You bet. H4831SC 3.6 inches, Woodleigh 400 grain bullets 75.9 grains = 2052 FPS
 
Aaron N asked "Has anyone loaded, or could one be loaded to 2300fps to match the 404? This would be in a Ruger No1."
That may well have been done. I have loaded 400 grain Woodies to 2100 fps in my Winchester 1895 .405 WCF (and take a cape buff with it). Another .405 shooter took his 400 grain Woodies up to 2200 fps using N133. With that powder, the Ruger #1 should be able to reach 2300 with the .405 case, much less with the larger 450/400 case.
I feel like it shouldn’t be an issue, but I’m curious if any members do it. A little more oomph behind the bullet might move it up in its weight class a bit.
 
If you’re loading for a double rifle then I would recommend Wright’s book as well as the Hornady manual. If you’re loading for a Ruger no.1 then I would recommend reduced loads as the recoil will be painful with a full load. I had a no.1 in .458 win mag and full power loads would rattle your teeth. There are some reduced loads listed online using 5744 that look good for hunting and your shoulder will thank you.
 
The problem is the little more oomp can make you lose the regulated distance. Been there done that
 
Wow something seems wrong with this chart. I use H4831SC which has same velocity characteristics of H4831 and Quick load shows 75.9 grains gives 2052 FPS. The above chart shows 82.3 which is way beyond pressure tolerance. Has anyone else checked these loads above
 
At what velocities do you see a decrease in penetration in these larger calibers. The gold standard is 2150, but people are moving up to 2300-2400 (more so in a .404). Is the extra recoil worth the extra impact?
 
At what velocities do you see a decrease in penetration in these larger calibers. The gold standard is 2150, but people are moving up to 2300-2400 (more so in a .404). Is the extra recoil worth the extra impact?
Respectively disagree. JJ told me 450-400 should be between 2050-2100 FPS and no more. He is the expert
 
Respectively disagree. JJ told me 450-400 should be between 2050-2100 FPS and no more. He is the expert
I would be loading for a Ruger No1 and not a double. I can’t see why it wouldn’t be advantageous to load a little hotter. It seems 2300 is a sweet spot for the Jeff, which was created to duplicate the 450/400 in a bolt gun.

Did JJ give you any reasoning?
 
Wow, a No 1 in 450/400 loading to 2,300, no thank you! I’m not recoil shy, my buffalo gun is a Lott, but that combo is going to hurt!

The 450/400 is a proven killer at traditional velocities.
 
"The 450/400 is a proven killer at traditional velocities."
+1
 
Wow, a No 1 in 450/400 loading to 2,300, no thank you! I’m not recoil shy, my buffalo gun is a Lott, but that combo is going to hurt!

The 450/400 is a proven killer at traditional velocities.
This is the heavy D barrel, which is said to come in at 9 1/4 lbs. With a scope and rings, it should be over 10 lbs. I am still waiting on it to be exported to verify these numbers though.

That being said, my question was more theoretical. We have numerous members firing a 400 grain bullet at 2300fps out of their 404’s. IF recoil was manageable, would there be an advantage to replicating that load in a 450/400. With a falling block, we can take regulation out of the equation, and the action would be sufficiently strong to handle it.
 
"The 450/400 is a proven killer at traditional velocities."
+1
So was the 404 at 2150, and yet 2300 seems to be what people are loading for.
 
Real Guns had an article on hand loading the Ruger No. 1 in 450/400. They gave the maximum load of H4831sc at 88grains for 2310fps and a maximum load of Reloader 19 at 86 grains for 2341fps. Also Tarbe had a thread on using imr 4831.
 
"Respectively disagree. JJ told me 450-400 should be between 2050-2100 FPS and no more. He is the expert"

Both of my .405 WCF rifles kill very effectively in this velocity range with .411 400 grain bullets, so I will stick with it.

If other folk want to load their .411 rifles to different velocities, that is their choice.
 
I would be loading for a Ruger No1 and not a double. I can’t see why it wouldn’t be advantageous to load a little hotter. It seems 2300 is a sweet spot for the Jeff, which was created to duplicate the 450/400 in a bolt gun.

Did JJ give you any reasoning?
He was talking about a double not a bolt gun
 
Have you seen Van der Walt's book 'African Dangerous Game Cartridges'?. He covers this ground and provides loading data and advice.

I have loaded my .404 Jeffery to 2400+, but now am shooting for approximately 2250 fps with Swift 400 grain A Frames and Barnes 400 grain Banded solids. I see nothing to be gained from the extra blast and recoil.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
54,249
Messages
1,149,696
Members
93,857
Latest member
NormanFaws
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

USN
Please a prayer request due to Michael Sipple being mauled by a Cape buffalo.

Bayly Sipple Safaris on FB for company statement.
SETH RINGER wrote on Fatback's profile.
IF YOU DON'T COME UP WITH ANY .458, I WILL TRY AND GET MY KID TO PACK SOME UP FOR YOU BUT PROBABLY WOUDN'T BE TILL THIS WEEKEND AND GO OUT NEXT WEEK.
PURA VIDA, SETH
sgtsabai wrote on Sika98k's profile.
I'm unfortunately on a diet. Presently in VA hospital as Agent Orange finally caught up with me. Cancer and I no longer can speak. If all goes well I'll be out of here and back home in Thailand by end of July. Tough road but I'm a tough old guy. I'll make it that hunt.
sgtsabai wrote on Wyfox's profile.
Nice one there. I guided for mulies and elk for about 10 or so years in northern New Mexico.
 
Top