Two South African hunting organisations expelled over CBL

BRICKBURN

Super moderator
Contributor
Lifetime titanium benefactor
AH ambassador
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
25,039
Reaction score
24,933
Location
Canada
Media
419
Articles
27
Hunting reports
Africa
8
USA/Canada
2
Europe
1
Hunted
Namibia, South Africa, Botswana, Mozambique, Canada, USA, Mexico, England
The next wave


Two South African hunting associations that embrace CBL hunting have lost an appeal to retain their membership to Europe's top hunting organisation, and have been thrown out of the International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation for breach of policy.

The decision was taken by the international council's general assembly in Madrid.

The expulsion of the Professional Hunters’ Association of South Africa (PHASA) and Confederation of Hunting Associations of South Africa (CHASA) is considered the strongest rejection of South Africa’s hunting policies, as well as of bodies which support canned lion or captive-bred lion shooting operations which are widely regarded as unethical and unsportsmanlike.

The expulsion follows a policy reversal by the two hunting bodies in November last year to support the captive lion hunting industry, and permit membership of their organisations by persons who engage in the practice of captive bred lion shooting. This is despite the fact that in 2015, PHASA members voted unanimously to reject captive lion hunts at the body’s AGM in Polokwane.

Tamás Marghescu, Director General of the International Council said that “both organisations had exercised their rights of appeal in accordance with the statutes, but failed in their bid to be reinstated. At the 65th General Assembly held in Madrid on May 4, an appeal was heard concerning the decision by the executive committee to expel the two organisations. The members decided by 114 votes to 3 that the organisations were in breach of policies and the expulsion was confirmed. There were 9 abstentions.”

In September 2016 the executive committee of International Council adopted the International Union for Conservation of Nature resolution 1 which called on the South African government to terminate the hunting of captive-bred lions.

Since PHASA’s 2017 AGM in November, the world’s leading hunting institutions have moved to distance themselves from the organisation and the canned lion hunting industry, which continues to tarnish South Africa’s conservation reputation.

The decision to expel to expel the two organisations was widely welcomed by representatives of prominent African hunting bodies and organisations.

Danene Van der Westhuyzen chairperson of the Operators and Professional Hunters Associations of Africa and vice president of the Namibian Professional Hunters Association said both organisations supported and applauded the decision. "It shows a movement towards unity, but even more so, that hunters condemn any such unethical practices.”

Custodians of Professional Hunting South Africa president Stewart Dorrington said: “The decision is not surprising. The International Council has always emphasised ethics and sportsmanship in hunting and are very conservation minded. Anybody who supports the captive bred lion industry in this day and age, will continue to isolate themselves from the world and their allies.

“The lion industry may be economically sustainable but is is not socially sustainable. The public will not tolerate it and will mobilise to close it down.

The South African Hunters and Game Conservation Association president, Gerhard Verdoorn, said: “The past two years have been an awakening for all hunters to return to the principles of hunting, namely the fair chase of a wild animal in its wild state and in its natural environment. Shooting captive bred lions, often in appalling conditions, simply don’t satisfy these criteria."

Several unsuccessful attempts were made to contact Professional Hunters’ Association of South Africa exco members for comment.


Source:
https://www.iol.co.za/ios/news/two-sa-hunting-organisations-expelled-over-canned-lion-hunts-14878048
 
This is despite the fact that in 2015, PHASA members voted unanimously to reject captive lion hunts at the body’s AGM in Polokwane.
The manner in which this is stated is either very misleading or entirely incorrect.
But I guess that’s probably irrelevant...


The South African Hunters and Game Conservation Association president, Gerhard Verdoorn, said: “The past two years have been an awakening for all hunters to return to the principles of hunting, namely the fair chase of a wild animal in its wild state and in its natural environment. Shooting captive bred lions, often in appalling conditions, simply don’t satisfy these criteria."
It would seem SAHGCA is going to be very busy criticising a lot of PH’s and Outfitters, and the SA model itself, for the foreseeable future...
 
There is no doubt which side of the equation the author was on.
 
The lion industry may be economically sustainable but is is not socially sustainable
As soon as they said not socially sustainable, they lost me. To me that translates to not acceptable to the Facebook crowd. I would have paid more attention if they had left this comment out!
 
That is their goal. Bring the pressure of the majority to bear and there is no better way than to keep :S Beat Dead Horse:
 
Didn't PHASA bring it upon themselves by their CBL policy reversal of Nov 2017?
 
as well as of bodies which support canned lion or captive-bred lion shooting operations which are widely regarded as unethical and unsportsmanlike.

Wouldn’t all animals hunted behind a fence fall within this definition?
 
Didn't PHASA bring it upon themselves by their CBL policy reversal of Nov 2017?

That is apparently the International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation's issue.
 
Wouldn’t all animals hunted behind a fence fall within this definition?

I have never read the International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation's policies. So, I can not answer that one.
 
As soon as they said not socially sustainable, they lost me. To me that translates to not acceptable to the Facebook crowd. I would have paid more attention if they had left this comment out!

Roger that. I read that to mean socially "acceptable". Sounds like an apology to the snowflake crowd.
 
these anti-hunters are vehemently against captive bred lion hunting, because it is unethical in their eyes.


but, they are also against hunting "wild" lions, because it is immoral in their eyes.

Hunters are not going to be able to do anything to please them short of actually shooting the lion that is standing on top of them about to rip out their jugulars.

And, then, it better be with a fast acting non-lethal sedative dart that won't kill the lion that was about to kill them.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
54,178
Messages
1,147,802
Members
93,722
Latest member
ElviaJoine
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

sgtsabai wrote on Tanks's profile.
Business is the only way to fly. I'm headed to SA August 25. I'm hoping that business isn't an arm and a leg. If you don't mind, what airline and the cost for your trip. Mine will be convoluted. I'll be flying into the states to pick up my 416 Rigby as Thailand doesn't allow firearms (pay no attention to the daily shootings and killings) so I'll have 2 very long trips.
Vonfergus wrote on JamesJ's profile.
I am interested in the Double
Nick BOWKER HUNTING SOUTH AFRICA wrote on EGS-HQ's profile.
Hi EGS

I read your thread with interest. Would you mind sending me that PDF? May I put it on my website?

Rob
85lc wrote on Douglas Johnson's profile.
Please send a list of books and prices.
 
Top