BryceM
AH elite
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2009
- Messages
- 1,031
- Reaction score
- 3,183
- Media
- 21
- Member of
- NRA, RMEF
- Hunted
- USA, Canada, Namibia
Tikka is quickly becoming one of my favorite rifles. On several PG hunts, I’ve used a certain T3 in .308 several times over the years in Namibia. This rifle spends many weeks per year in the field with a variety of clients. The last time I used it was two weeks ago during trip number 8. While it was once new, it now has many thousands of rounds down the tube, the stock has been beat to pieces, the scope has its share of missing paint, and the thing just keeps on shooting. Seeing it each time is like revisiting an old friend. I absolutely trust it, and I’ve used it for many, many headshots culling duiker, springbok and kudu.
So, what did I do? I came home and placed an order for a T3X in .308.
So, their reliability is known. Their inherent accuracy and quality of manufacture are well-established. The actions are solid. When it comes to value, they often shoot as good, or even better, than custom rifles with match barrels. They are well-reviewed, and hardly anyone has anything bad to say about them…… EXCEPT for one recurring theme.
The stupid plastic magazine feels cheap, is cheap, and seems out of place on such a fine rifle. I have never talked Tikkas with anyone who didn’t lament and bemoan the plastic magazine. Now, I’ll admit, they are much more durable and reliable than I would have anticipated, but I’d be very, very happy to pay a bit extra for a solid piece of hardware that I have to manipulate each and every time I load or unload the thing.
Just today I mentioned the rifle to an acquaintance who does plenty of shooting. First thing out of his mouth….. “I love Tikkas, hate the plastic magazine.”
When every single customer holds their nose about one feature, why not listen, and give customers what they want? I am absolutely certain that one design decision has turned off many potential customers. Am I missing something?
So, what did I do? I came home and placed an order for a T3X in .308.
So, their reliability is known. Their inherent accuracy and quality of manufacture are well-established. The actions are solid. When it comes to value, they often shoot as good, or even better, than custom rifles with match barrels. They are well-reviewed, and hardly anyone has anything bad to say about them…… EXCEPT for one recurring theme.
The stupid plastic magazine feels cheap, is cheap, and seems out of place on such a fine rifle. I have never talked Tikkas with anyone who didn’t lament and bemoan the plastic magazine. Now, I’ll admit, they are much more durable and reliable than I would have anticipated, but I’d be very, very happy to pay a bit extra for a solid piece of hardware that I have to manipulate each and every time I load or unload the thing.
Just today I mentioned the rifle to an acquaintance who does plenty of shooting. First thing out of his mouth….. “I love Tikkas, hate the plastic magazine.”
When every single customer holds their nose about one feature, why not listen, and give customers what they want? I am absolutely certain that one design decision has turned off many potential customers. Am I missing something?