US court gives green light to import Namibia rhino trophies

AfricaHunting.com

Founder
AH ambassador
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Messages
13,085
Reaction score
9,184
Website
www.africahunting.com
Media
5,597
Articles
321
The Namibian, 31 March 2016

AMERICAN hunters can import endangered black rhino trophies from Namibia despite opposition from two conservation groups that argued this will encourage poaching.
A Washington DC District Court ruled on Monday that there was no legal basis in the challenge mounted by the US-based conservation group Friends of Animals and the Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force (ZCTF).

Judge Amy Berman Jackson made the ruling in a joint lawsuit filed in the Washington DC District Court in April 2014 by the two conservation groups that sought a court interdict against two contentious black rhino hunts conducted in Namibia last year.

A US website Courthouse News quoted Judge Jackson saying the importation of proceeds from hunting permits, which included a US$300 000 rhino hunt carried out by trophy hunter Cory Knowlton, did not constitute a threat to the preservation of the black rhino.

Judge Jackson said this was because the permits were issued by the Namibian government after considering the possible impacts on conservation.

“The court recognises the plaintiffs' sincere commitment to the preservation of endangered animals, and this ruling does not suggest that there is no relationship between the importation of trophies of endangered animals and protecting these species.

“But the relationship between the particular permits challenged here, which authorise the import of spoils of hunts that were entirely within Namibia's control, and plaintiffs' feared diminished enjoyment of black rhinoceros in Namibia in the future is too attenuated to confer standing on plaintiffs,” Jackson added.

Further, Judge Berman said any decision to cancel the hunts and import permits in the US would not prevent Namibia from staging black rhino hunts in future.

She added that the two organisations were 'neither an agency action nor a final action agency', and as such, their objections to the two permits did not grant them a platform to request a 'wholesale correction' of the actions of the agencies which issued the permits.

The judge said the arguments presented were 'conclusory' and depended on the actions of third parties who were not part of the court proceedings.

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (Cites) say the black rhino has been a critically endangered species for decades.

In 2014, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Peta) also approached a US court in Virginia challenging the two Namibian hunts.

Namibian Information minister Tjekero Tweya announced in early March that the government had resolved to reject all calls by conservationists opposed to its policy of allowing the intentional hunting of animals which include rhinos.

Tweya said Cabinet directed the environment ministry to actively campaign against any attempt to ban or restrict hunting and exporting of wildlife products.

“Cabinet took note that a code of conduct for conservation hunting is being developed, accompanied by improvements in the regulation of hunting and strengthening the link between hunting and conservation,” Tweya said.

According to the government, proceeds from trophy hunting are used to fund several wildlife conservation projects. In 2013, the Namibian government approved plans to sell five black rhinos for trophy hunting annually until 2018.

Nearly 100 rhinos were killed by poachers in Namibia in 2015. This year, more than 40 carcasses of poached rhinos have been discovered, mainly in the Etosha National park, while more than 100 elephants have been confirmed as having been killed by poachers in game sanctuaries which include the Bwabwata National Park since January. - ANA
 
Thanks for sharing!
 
Well I know it doesn't stand to reason .........but this Judge who got it right......was appointed to the court by.........
You guessed it Obama!

Have Mercy a federal judge who did not they to make new laws from the bench.
Good for Judge Jackson!
 
The court recognises the plaintiffs' sincere commitment to the preservation of endangered animals, and this ruling does not suggest that there is no relationship between the importation of trophies of endangered animals and protecting these species

Left it open to govern by import ban in the future. Which, let's face it, isn't a surprose, nor is this tactic used on hunting only. It is just another form of trade sanction.... just not one I agree with.

She added that the two organisations were 'neither an agency action nor a final action agency', and as such, their objections to the two permits did not grant them a platform to request a 'wholesale correction' of the actions of the agencies which issued the permits.

This seems really interesting. It seems to state that just because the antis don't agree it doesn't matter and not much they can do about it. Good in this one rulimg, but might cut the other way next time?
 
Glad for this one victory - but suspect that they will appeal to a higher court and drag this out longer. Hopefully, the USFWS won't go back on its approval for the importation nor decide not to allow importation in the future.
 
Glad for this one victory - but suspect that they will appeal to a higher court and drag this out longer. Hopefully, the USFWS won't go back on its approval for the importation nor decide not to allow importation in the future.

I personally don't think they will. The proof is there and provided that this won't hurting the population and poaching is under control especially in relation to SA. If anything, SA is at risk of a rhino ban I think.

It does at least show that their is a possible path forward if the rules are followed. Whether the US should make those rules is an entirely different thread....
 
I assume that contrary to what appears to be the case from time to time, the antis resources can't be unlimited - happy to have them tilting at this windmill for the foreseeable future. I know it's not great for Mr. Knowlton, but I belelive he will ultimately prevail, and if this keeps some of them busy in the meantime, well, so much the better.
 
As I read it the article, the decision is based on lack of standing of the two groups. While the judge did appear to make some comments that suggests hunting is not hurting the animals, the decision appears to be based on the finding that the groups connection to the hunt is too tenuous for them to have the right to bring suit. It is a carefully circumscribed legal decision regarding the lack of standing of particular groups in a particular case.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
54,068
Messages
1,144,914
Members
93,549
Latest member
KathrinMcG
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Black wildebeest hunted this week!
Cwoody wrote on Woodcarver's profile.
Shot me email if Beretta 28 ga DU is available
Thank you
Pancho wrote on Safari Dave's profile.
Enjoyed reading your post again. Believe this is the 3rd time. I am scheduled to hunt w/ Legadema in Sep. Really looking forward to it.
check out our Buff hunt deal!
 
Top