The Latest Information About African Leopards

TRAVEL EXPRESS

Sponsor
Since 2010
AH elite
Reviews
25
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
1,320
Reaction score
808
Website
www.travelexpressagency.com
Deals & offers
4
Media
57
Articles
5
Hunting reports
Africa
1
USA/Canada
1
Member of
Safari Club International, Dallas Safari Club, Wild Sheep Foundation, Boone & Crockett Club, PHASA
african-leopard-122816.jpg


SCI and the SCI Foundation are working together to respond to the latest attempt by anti-hunting groups to interfere with sustainable use conservation. Most recently, these animal rights groups have focused their efforts on African leopards.

In response to a petition filed in July 2016 by the Humane Society of the United States, Humane Society International, Center for Biological Diversity, International Fund for Animal Welfare and Fund for Animals, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced a 90-day finding that an endangered listing for all African leopards currently listed as threatened “may be warranted.”

african-leopard-2-122816.jpg


The FWS’s 90-day finding DOES NOT MEAN that all African leopards are now listed as endangered. Currently, leopards in 18 countries in Africa south of and including Gabon, Congo, Zaire, Uganda and Kenya remain listed as threatened. The FWS makes a “90-day finding” based on very limited data – solely on the information submitted with the petition and any data already in the FWS’s own files. The FWS must collect far more data in order to make a decision whether to list a species.

If the FWS makes a “may be warranted” 90-day finding, as it has for the African leopard, it must next complete a thorough status review, known as a “12-month finding.” To complete this task, the FWS must evaluate the “best scientific and commercial data available” to determine whether the petitioned action is “warranted.”
In the Federal Register notice announcing the 90-day finding for the African leopard, the FWS itself stated “because the Act’s standards for 90-day and 12-month findings are different, a substantial 90-day finding does not mean that the 12-month finding will result in a ‘warranted’ finding.”

Currently, the FWS is soliciting comments from the public including “scientific and commercial data and other information” regarding the African leopard to help inform its 12-month finding. SCI’s Litigation Department attorneys and SCI Foundation’s biologists are working together to prepare comments that provide both scientific and legal information that will help the FWS to make a determination that will not interfere with or harm ongoing sustainable use conservation of the African leopard. Comments are due on or before Jan. 30, 2017. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has published a fact sheet that describes the process for importing legally sport-hunted leopards into the United States.

african-leopard-3-122816.jpg


If the FWS does make a 12-month finding that a species-wide endangered listing “is warranted” it will then publish a proposed rule to list the African leopard as endangered and will again solicit public comment on its proposed decision. If it becomes necessary, SCI and SCIF will collaborate on additional comments at that time, as well as evaluating other potential courses of action. The listing process, regardless of its possible outcome, will take the FWS many months to complete.

Currently, all African leopards are listed on CITES Appendix I and CITES has established maximum export quotas for the exportation of trophies from twelve African countries. In 2016, a handful of these countries made the requisite findings for exportation of legally hunted leopards.

Unrelated to the petition submitted by the anti-hunting groups, the Republic of South Africa did not export leopards in 2016 because its biologists were unable to make the required CITES determination that the export of leopards would not be detrimental to the survival of the species. SCI Foundation believes that it is probable that South Africa will not have the information they will need to reverse that decision in 2017. The SCI Foundation has offered to assist South Africa with their data collection process to help them achieve a non-detriment finding. SCI Foundation’s biologists will be meeting with a delegation from South Africa at the SCI Annual Convention to further address this issue.

SCI and SCIF will continue their work on this issue and make every effort to ensure that the FWS has the best legal and scientific data available with which to make its decisions. In addition, we will continue to update the SCI membership as developments occur.

SCI and the SCI Foundation will also be presenting the most recent information at a seminar at the SCI Convention entitled “Where Are We Now – The Latest on Elephants, Lions and Leopards” on Wednesday, Feb. 1, 2017, Lagoon K-L, Mandalay Bay Convention Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, 2–3:00 p.m.–Anna M. Seidman, SCI Director of Litigation.



Source: Safari Club International (SCI)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
View attachment 168745

SCI and the SCI Foundation are working together to respond to the latest attempt by anti-hunting groups to interfere with sustainable use conservation. Most recently, these animal rights groups have focused their efforts on African leopards.

In response to a petition filed in July 2016 by the Humane Society of the United States, Humane Society International, Center for Biological Diversity, International Fund for Animal Welfare and Fund for Animals, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced a 90-day finding that an endangered listing for all African leopards currently listed as threatened “may be warranted.”

View attachment 168746

The FWS’s 90-day finding DOES NOT MEAN that all African leopards are now listed as endangered. Currently, leopards in 18 countries in Africa south of and including Gabon, Congo, Zaire, Uganda and Kenya remain listed as threatened. The FWS makes a “90-day finding” based on very limited data – solely on the information submitted with the petition and any data already in the FWS’s own files. The FWS must collect far more data in order to make a decision whether to list a species.

If the FWS makes a “may be warranted” 90-day finding, as it has for the African leopard, it must next complete a thorough status review, known as a “12-month finding.” To complete this task, the FWS must evaluate the “best scientific and commercial data available” to determine whether the petitioned action is “warranted.”
In the Federal Register notice announcing the 90-day finding for the African leopard, the FWS itself stated “because the Act’s standards for 90-day and 12-month findings are different, a substantial 90-day finding does not mean that the 12-month finding will result in a ‘warranted’ finding.”

Currently, the FWS is soliciting comments from the public including “scientific and commercial data and other information” regarding the African leopard to help inform its 12-month finding. SCI’s Litigation Department attorneys and SCI Foundation’s biologists are working together to prepare comments that provide both scientific and legal information that will help the FWS to make a determination that will not interfere with or harm ongoing sustainable use conservation of the African leopard. Comments are due on or before Jan. 30, 2017. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has published a fact sheet that describes the process for importing legally sport-hunted leopards into the United States.

View attachment 168747

If the FWS does make a 12-month finding that a species-wide endangered listing “is warranted” it will then publish a proposed rule to list the African leopard as endangered and will again solicit public comment on its proposed decision. If it becomes necessary, SCI and SCIF will collaborate on additional comments at that time, as well as evaluating other potential courses of action. The listing process, regardless of its possible outcome, will take the FWS many months to complete.

Currently, all African leopards are listed on CITES Appendix I and CITES has established maximum export quotas for the exportation of trophies from twelve African countries. In 2016, a handful of these countries made the requisite findings for exportation of legally hunted leopards.

Unrelated to the petition submitted by the anti-hunting groups, the Republic of South Africa did not export leopards in 2016 because its biologists were unable to make the required CITES determination that the export of leopards would not be detrimental to the survival of the species. SCI Foundation believes that it is probable that South Africa will not have the information they will need to reverse that decision in 2017. The SCI Foundation has offered to assist South Africa with their data collection process to help them achieve a non-detriment finding. SCI Foundation’s biologists will be meeting with a delegation from South Africa at the SCI Annual Convention to further address this issue.

SCI and SCIF will continue their work on this issue and make every effort to ensure that the FWS has the best legal and scientific data available with which to make its decisions. In addition, we will continue to update the SCI membership as developments occur.

SCI and the SCI Foundation will also be presenting the most recent information at a seminar at the SCI Convention entitled “Where Are We Now – The Latest on Elephants, Lions and Leopards” on Wednesday, Feb. 1, 2017, Lagoon K-L, Mandalay Bay Convention Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, 2–3:00 p.m.–Anna M. Seidman, SCI Director of Litigation.



Source: Safari Club International (SCI)
I was have been waiting to hunt leopard in SA for two years now - without lion and now leopard I most likely will hold off on returning to SA until 2018. Hoping some of this nonsense stops.

dt
 
Thank you for the update Lori and Jennifer. Let us hope Zinke and a new FWS head will use science, and not feelings when it comes to policy decisions.
 
Thank you!
 
Trump will make them see the light or slash their budgets till they do
 
Hopefully RSA can get their stuff together.
 
Let's hope it all works out.
 
I find it very arrogant that the USFWS believes that it knows more than the African countries that actually host leopards and will impose restrictions. How would the USA like it if Canada believed that coyotes are threatened in Rhode Island and therefore restrictions etc will be unilaterally imposed.

No wonder many Africans are calling the USA and western nations actions on wildlife "neo-colonialism".

It is time to clip the horns of the USFWS. If that means disbanding it, then do it. I hope Trump and the new Interior Secretary gets on with it. A federal agency taking orders from biased untruthful petitioners, unbelievable.
 
Thank you for the update Lori and Jennifer. Let us hope Zinke and a new FWS head will use science, and not feelings when it comes to policy decisions.

+1
 
I hope to get my tag this month to hunt the great cat one more time. This anti hunting bullshit has to stop being based on emotion by those who know nothing.
 
I'm A Zimbabwe PH and it's no secret that all PHs, staff, trackers etc livelihoods have been affected by these bans. However in Zimbabwe there has been some good that has come because of it, the age of our cats (Lions and Leopards) shot these last two years has increased, so has the quality. This is thanks to our Zimbabwe Professional Hunters Associations proactive approach and new rulings as a result of USFWD investigations into African Hunting. The quantity and quality of the documentation which is needed for research has improved ten fold. The mindset of Professional Hunters has changed for the good. This is all thanks to the efforts of our association (ZPHGA) the Safari operators and the individual PH's trying to keep the Hunting industry and in turn the Wildlife in those areas alive. I don't agree with everything that has happened but there is some good!!
Thanks for the update!
 
Good point Doug. If this causes some further positive action from the various governments and professional associations across Southern Africa I'll be impressed.
 
No leopard tag for me.....:(
 
So disappointed . Yes trying to get a good deal for buffalo and hippo. Then plains game hunt with Kingsview.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
53,618
Messages
1,131,274
Members
92,675
Latest member
jhonmark007
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Impact shots from the last hunt

Early morning Impala hunt, previous link was wrong video

Headshot on jackal this morning

Mature Eland Bull taken in Tanzania, at 100 yards, with 375 H&H, 300gr, Federal Premium Expanding bullet.

20231012_145809~2.jpg
 
Top