The Colour Game Is Over

robertq

AH fanatic
Joined
Jun 17, 2013
Messages
689
Reaction score
628
Location
Wallkill, NY
Media
1
Articles
21
Member of
Life member of DSC, SCI, NRA, Rocky Mt Elk Foundation, American Hunter, Buck Masters & Ruffed Grouse Society
Hunted
Russia, Argentina, Canada & South Africa
Thoughts?



colour-variant.jpg


The breeding of wildlife to produce unusually coloured animals, in the hope that hunters would pay a lot more to shoot them, has fallen flat in a spectacular manner — with the practice being widely condemned.

If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. The old adage has become a painful reality for speculators who stampeded into the colour-variant game sector.

Luring them were rocketing prices being paid at game auctions for colour variants bred in captivity and not found in the wild. Described as “unnatural freaks” by Peter Flack, one of South Africa’s foremost game experts, colour variants include black impala, white impala, gold wildebeest, white gemsbok and king wildebeest.

“Buyers grabbed anything they could at auctions,” says Johan Vorster, a Vleissentraal game auctioneer.

The idea was that hunters would pay more to shoot unusually coloured trophy animals. But what the buyers were getting into had all the makings of a classic pyramid scheme: early entrants make big money. Latecomers lose their boots.

This is exactly how it played out. By early 2016 prices of colour variants were already sliding. They went on to collapse.

It is not that there weren’t warning signs. As early as 2011 the International Council for Game & Wildlife Conservation (CIC) declared colour variants a manipulation of wild game and said they should not be hunted.

Average auction prices supplied by Game & Hunt of colour variants tell a sad tale. Among extreme examples, the average price paid for white impala in 2014 was R8.2m. In 2016 the average was R48,333.

Other colour-variant prices have suffered a similar fate. Of black impalas, which sold at an average of R384,964 in 2014, SA-based CIC executive Gerhard Damm says: “I doubt you will get more than R10,000 for a black impala ram.”

With colour-variant animals, a supply was created for which there is no real demand where it counts most — from hunters, says Lizanne Nel, conservation manager at the 45,000-member SA Hunters & Game Conservation Society (SA Hunters).

It is not only because of their unnatural nature that hunters shun colour variants.

“Most hunters want a responsible hunt,” says Nel. “You can’t have it when an animal is bred in captivity.”

Virtually all leading foreign hunting organisations have adopted this stance. Among them is the influential US-based Boone & Crockett Club, which has voiced strong opposition to the hunting of bred animals.

Nel believes the collapse in colour-variant animal prices is primarily thanks to advocacy work done by SA Hunters and other hunting and conservation bodies. Not all industry players fully agree.

Among them is game breeder Jacques Malan. He concedes “badmouthing by hunters” has done a lot of damage, but argues the biggest problem has been the devastating drought.

“There was no natural vegetation,” says Malan. “Breeders faced the huge expense of buying fodder.”

“The drought had a big impact,” says Vorster. “Some breeders had to sell at any price.”

Malan believes recent good rains will restore the colour-variant market’s fortunes. “The natural vegetation is back. We will see a lot of confidence return.”

Nel disagrees. The drought, she says, may have contributed to the collapse but the real damage has been done by the realisation that there is no viable market for colour variants.

“The colour-variant game is over,” says Flack. Damm agrees.

But Damm, Flack and Nel stress that the colour-variant controversy has dealt SA’s game industry another big reputational blow. It follows the huge damage done by the “canned lion” hunting debacle.
Canned lion hunting involves releasing captive-bred lion into small enclosures where they are shot with ease by “hunters”. It is a practice of which Flack has said: “It is not hunting, it is slaughter.”

The world agrees. The US has banned the import of lion trophies from SA.

The captive breeding of buffalo for hunting
There is another area of concern for conservationists: captive breeding of buffalo with exceptional horn-spread widths. Huge prices are paid for these animals. In September a new record for a single animal was set when a buffalo bull was sold for R168m. Four years earlier the record was R26m.

Buffalo ranchers claim they are breeding back top genetics ruined by reckless hunting in the past. Nel is not buying it.

“The principles are the same as those applying to colour variants,” says Nel. “Animals are dependent on humans. You can’t hunt them and then say it was a fair hunt.”

“You would think SA’s game industry is on a mission to self-destruct,” says Damm. Foreign hunter numbers coming to SA underscore his concern.

In 2014, the latest year for which data is available, 7,638 foreign hunters came to SA, less than half the best-yet figures of 16,394 in 2006.

The big winner is Namibia, a country free of canned hunting and colour variants.

“Foreign-hunter numbers to Namibia grew from 6,300 in 2007 to 23,768 in 2014,” says Flack



Source: http://africageographic.com/blog/hunting-colour-game/
 
Thanks Robert very informative. I for one don't like the enhancement of "colored" animals. Let's just hunt and have fun.
 
I do not agree with the Colour breed. It has only one agenda.... that is to make ranchers rich.
It does not enhance the breed or contributes anything to conservation. This will turn out to be just like the caged lion.........
 
Private property rights folks. If you don't want to hunt a colored one or a big one that matter it is your choice. Talk of banning people's business practices is Socialism!

Regards,
Philip
 
It's not Socialism...... IT"S ETHICAL....... You don't fool with MOTHER NATURE !!!!!!!
 
Kinda have to agree with Robert on this one. But I do understand your point Phillip
 
. . . “Most hunters want a responsible hunt,” says Nel. “You can’t have it when an animal is bred in captivity" . . .

I agree with the above quote from the article.


.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Soooo tired of hearing about color variants here in RSA.

As with most markets its had its ups and is now on the downward trend (to the joy and amusement of local meat hunters here!)

Anyone who has or had a animal with even the slightest colour diffence was wanting to retire of the sale of his golden spotted red arsed long horned Wildebees or Blesbuck or whatever.

A lot of people were betting that the foreign hunters would have to have a color variant animal!
but most of guys I talk to have zero interest in shooting the colored animals.
 
Breeding particular colors of animals and then have them breed true in a large enclosed area where they are self sustaining may not result in a creature I want to shoot or a hunting situation in which I care to participate, but I don't find it unethical - silly - but not unethical. If the animals being taken are killed in small enclosures or being bred in pens and then released into herds simply to be shot in a put and take environment (why I have issues with captive bred lion hunting), that is to my mind problematic. But the practice itself, if legal, is the right of the landowner/investor. And of course we fool Mother Nature all the time. I prefer angus beef to scrub cattle; we selectively harvest whitetail in this part of the world; Desert Big Horn are increasing because of artificial water points in their range; Aoudad roam Western Texas and Eastern New Mexico where Mother Nature had never intended them. I could go on.
 
just a note on this

all the exotics in Texas dont belong there either, kudu, oryx, rhino, sable, eland etc etc, isnt this messing with mother nature in a much bigger way
but on private land the land owner can do what is legal and its legal
and if the market has dropped then the market has dropped, no need to point fingers and laugh or make comments in my opinion. its all about supply and demand, there are a lot of colour variants around now so prices have dropped.
will a demand from the hunting market develop, not sure, who knows, maybe when prices drop enough that it becomes feasible to the hunter, then probably yes
i do agree then that they must not be hunted in small areas.
just a note colour variants numbers are still and always will be but a fraction of the total number of standard colour animals of that species, so have never, and will never posed any kind of threat to conservation. actually to the contrary they have probably benefitted..

regards
 
I am surprised that almost 3 times as many hunters went to Namibia over RSA.

As far as color variants, no opinion someone wants to hunt them, have at it but I am not going to pay more to do it.

Everyone I talked to over there saw this crash coming though. Just like any fad there are ups and downs.
 
Things always come back to supply and demand as noted above. Not sure there was ever a big demand from the hunters. I wouldn't mind having a white Blesbock but I was never going to pay $2000 for one no matter how many were around.
 
But what the buyers were getting into had all the makings of a classic pyramid scheme: early entrants make big money. Latecomers lose their boots.

This is what happened. I said it at the beginning and compared it to Ostrich/Emu here in the States a few years ago.

No commodity stays high forever and those that thought color variants were "different" lost their shirts I'm sure. Greed happens.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And of course we fool Mother Nature all the time. I prefer angus beef to scrub cattle; we selectively harvest whitetail in this part of the world; Desert Big Horn are increasing because of artificial water points in their range; Aoudad roam Western Texas and Eastern New Mexico where Mother Nature had never intended them. I could go on.

This - meat, grain, dairy, decorative plants. We fool with it all, all day long. Heck, drilling wells for water and having more animals stay in an area than "God intended" is fooling with mother nature. Hwange didn't have ele year round until the water was there year round.
 
To each there own. In my view none of the variants are better or different enough to be considered seperate from the original. So, I don't see a 'series' or 'slam' of all the variants as anything more than multiple of the same animal. But if others do, go for it. The worrisome part is when the outfitter or PH isn't very clear what a hunter is about to kill and pay for. There is a recent posting of this with a golden blue wildebeest the hunter though was a blue and he was forced to pay $13,500 for.
 
I don't care which side of the fence you are on with Colour variants, we need to read between the lines. (pun intended)
Let's see what I can conclude from this UNBIASED :A Vomit:AFRICA GEOGRAPHIC mewling.
The Cherry picking of quotes to reinforce the story line is so blatant it is sickening.

The message:

AUCTIONEER Vorster- Everyone in RSA is greedy.

CONSERVATION BODY (Local chapter) Damm - Colour variants should not be hunted and price are going to catastrophically drop.

HUNTERS ASSOCIATION Nel - "don't hunt animals held in captivity". I guess high fence hunting is out.o_O

FARMER - Malan - It's the drought feed is costly so people sell animals.

AUCTIONEER - Vorster- backs the drought issue causing declining prices.


AUTHOR Flack- prognosticates dire conclusions for the entire country. Even though RSA has been one of the greatest conservation successes in the world, the industry and indeed the entire country is bound for damnation.

AG - falsely reporting an all out ban on Lion imports into the USA. COMPLETELY FALSE STATEMENT.o_O But it supports the theme of the article that South Africa is going to hell and is beyond redmeption.

HUNTERS ASSOCIATION Nel - Animals are dependent on humans. You can’t hunt them and then say it was a fair hunt.” o_O
The implication that the entire game industry in RSA is corrupt apparently and no one has actually been on a fair hunt.

CONSERVATION BODY & AUTHOR Damm and Flack - Quoting disparate travel statistics. Different years, different countries.

I just finished reading a soon-to-be published research report. It found that "in 2017 the African Lion is actually extinct, in my backyard!"
It is hard to believe they are all gone, but they are. It is sad, but the statistics are a known fact. :(


Do you think the Auctioneer and the Farmer might be closer to the business end of the industry than the talking heads.

The writer quotes Boone and Crockett, which is ONLY focused on NORTH AMERICAN species. How is their policy relevant to Africa? It's not. But it works well in the propaganda being written.

Then AG goes about asking LOCAL chapters of CIC and also the SA HUNTERS - The quotes attributed to these two buffoons should have them losing their jobs. The Nel quotes are astounding in their ignorance of the reality in RSA. This twit must have never left Capetown and or is leagally blind and can not see all the high fences in RSA. Can someone have ever been hunting in RSA and not seen all the fences that demonstrate all the animals that are dependant on humans?

The price drop for ALL game sales is due to supply and demand. Just not the BS factors these dumb asses are attributing it to.
Supply and Demand for FODDER.
Drought, no food, sell before the animals die. Makes sense to me.
Have hunters not been wondering about the impact of the drought on hunting/game prices. Anyone noticed all the CULL HUNTS lately? I wonder why?
Anyone noticed what Sable prices have been doing in RSA lately?

Are some of the historic "record" prices at auction for some type of tax decision or other shell game with breeders? No idea, but those prices are just that, a record, not a mean (average) price.

Throwing in the word "canned" into an article should make readers immediately question the writers integrity. It is ANTI propaganda, with the sole purpose of distracting the reader from the FACTS.
It is obvious this article abuses quotes from unsuspecting twits and known abolitionists to attack the RSA hunting/game industry.

(Now I'll throw in the CYA statement that allows me to have deniability of being a Colour variant proponent. Following the AG writer's game plan)

I have no intention of hunting some genetically modified coloured critter any time soon. If you want to, have at it.
 
@BRICKBURN there is definitely an agenda there. I was not 100% sure what it was though, seems kind of anti RSA to be honest. But also wasn't sure if it was against, high fence, game auctions, color breeding, drought, seems like it is a little all over the place.

I did see the Boone and Crocket reference and kind of giggle. But I need to be more cynical and realize that some Anti somewhere could throw this in our face.
 
Breeding particular colors of animals and then have them breed true in a large enclosed area where they are self sustaining may not result in a creature I want to shoot or a hunting situation in which I care to participate, but I don't find it unethical - silly - but not unethical. If the animals being taken are killed in small enclosures or being bred in pens and then released into herds simply to be shot in a put and take environment (why I have issues with captive bred lion hunting), that is to my mind problematic. But the practice itself, if legal, is the right of the landowner/investor. And of course we fool Mother Nature all the time. I prefer angus beef to scrub cattle; we selectively harvest whitetail in this part of the world; Desert Big Horn are increasing because of artificial water points in their range; Aoudad roam Western Texas and Eastern New Mexico where Mother Nature had never intended them. I could go on.
Redleg, yes all the animals were imported and habitat was created......but their genetics weren't altered......
 
I agree with the above quote from the article.


.
If it weren't for high fences and the resultant private ownership of game all safaris would cost Tanzania prices. RSA would still be cattle and sheep country and there would be no AH for you to post an opinion about "bred animals".
Guys we would not be having this discussion if it were not for game farms! NONE of you outfitters, taxidermists, or importers would have a job!
I understand animal breeding (it's what I do!) has at times been taken too far for some tastes but you must understand the fundamentals of the issues.
People in these articles want to stop private Breeders from doing business the way they want to. Is that freedom or socialism?
Regards,
Philip
 
I am definitely not against game farms and think they serve a purpose in hunting and conservation. How many Rhinos are there with out game farms? Same thing with addax and oryx in Texas. If someone wants to pay a premium for a color variant, he should be able to do it. This is nothing more then market conditions.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
53,997
Messages
1,142,735
Members
93,373
Latest member
Efren35C00
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Cwoody wrote on Woodcarver's profile.
Shot me email if Beretta 28 ga DU is available
Thank you
Pancho wrote on Safari Dave's profile.
Enjoyed reading your post again. Believe this is the 3rd time. I am scheduled to hunt w/ Legadema in Sep. Really looking forward to it.
check out our Buff hunt deal!
Because of some clients having to move their dates I have 2 prime time slots open if anyone is interested to do a hunt
5-15 May
or 5-15 June is open!
shoot me a message for a good deal!
dogcat1 wrote on skydiver386's profile.
I would be interested in it if you pass. Please send me the info on the gun shop if you do not buy it. I have the needed ammo and brass.
Thanks,
Ross
 
Top