Suspicious tender at heart of Zambian hippo culling scandal

Discussion in 'News & Announcements' started by Hoas, Jul 13, 2018 at 9:52 AM.

  1. Hoas

    Hoas AH Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2014
    Messages:
    421
    Video/Photo:
    280
    Likes Received:
    596
    The proposed hippo culling spree in Zambia’s world-renowned Luangwa Valley has a dodgy tender process at its core and appears to be an attempt by Zambian Government to cover up a contract-gone-wrong.

    This is according to a source close to the Department of National Parks and Wildlife (DNPW), saying the Department was sued by Mabwe Adventures Limited, the hunting company contracted to execute the cull. A recent court ruling in the Mabwe’s favour fueled the Department’s sudden backtracking on its 2016 anti-cull decision in order to avoid paying compensation, the source says.

    Zambian Minister of Tourism and Arts Charles Banda confirmed that a contract entered into with Mabwe Adventures in 2015 was still valid, even though operations of the then Zambian Wildlife Authority (ZAWA) were taken over by the DNPW under the Ministry of Tourism and Arts.

    Flawed from the offset

    The contract was awarded to Mabwe under suspicious circumstances. Zambia’s 2017 Parastatal Report notes not only an irregularity with the Mabwe tender, but also confirms that a sum of 81 108 Zambian Kwacha (around R110 000) was paid to ZAWA by Mabwe.

    The report instructed ZAWA, now the DNPW, “to desist from willfully disregarding Government procedures [and] to submit the report of the hippo culling exercise indicating the number of hippos culled as well as the supporting documentation showing the amounts paid to ZAWA for audit verification, after which the matter is recommended for closure.”

    The local Luangwa Safari Association (LSA) also raised concern over the suspicious tender in a letter directed to the Ministry of Tourism and Arts last year, saying local safari authorities and associations weren’t “aware of any public Tender Advertisement for culling of hippos”.

    According to the DNPW source, local wildlife authorities within the Luangwa region are still working to void the culling contract for not following the legal channels, and for not considering any scientific of conservation management research.

    Contradiction of area-specific scientific data

    The decision to cull will effectively allow South African trophy hunters into the world famous Luangwa Valley to hunt at least 1250 animals – 250 hippos annually for the next five years until 2022.

    According to Banda, the “reason for [the] culling of hippos is to control the hippo population on the Luangwa River so as to maintain a suitable habitat for other aquatic species and wildlife in general.” An outbreak of anthrax, combined with low rainfall, also contributed to the DNPW’s decision to cull.

    Scientists including those from Zambia’s own Wildlife Authority disagree.

    A paper published in the International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation in 2013 by Dr Chansa Chomba, who headed up the Department of Research, Planning, Information and Veterinary Services for ZAWA at the time, concluded that culls are ineffective in controlling hippo populations. In fact, the research found that culling rather stimulated the population growth in Luangwa.

    “The act of culling removes excess males and frees resources for the remaining female individuals, leading to increased births […] rather than suppressing population growth rate”, the scientific and peer-reviewed research states.

    The claim of an ‘anthrax threat’ also falls short. Local conservation groups say “there is little evidence that culling will have any effect on a seasonal resurgence of anthrax. In a year when rainfall levels and vegetation growth have been normal, there is no proof that a cull of healthy animals would prevent any future anthrax outbreaks.”

    Against concession agreements and tourism

    Hunting authorities in the region are concerned, saying the “so-called cull is in direct contrast with all safari hunting concessions along the Luangwa Valley.” According to the Safari Hunting Concession agreement, stakeholders are not legally allowed to invite external parties into their territories for commercial hunting.

    Mabwe Adventures founder and owner Leon Joubert states, however, that the hunting of the hippo would effectively be taking place in the river, which isn’t within the boundaries of the National Park or hunting concessions. He states that “if the National Parks want to hunt in the National Park, they can hunt in the river.”

    The precedent set by this mass-slaughter in a supposedly protected National Park will blur the boundaries of conservation efforts in the National Parks of not only Zambia, but the rest of Africa. “The negative consequences for thousands of hippo and Zambia’s reputation as a wildlife tourism destination cannot be underestimated,” Born Free warns.

    Marcel Arzner, a frequent and long-term photographic safari client who has spent thousands over the past three years on trips to the region, cancelled his upcoming visit due to the cull. “My cancelation for the next trip will be followed by many others. The negative impact on Zambia’s tourism industry will be disastrous”.

    Hippos are currently listed as “Vulnerable” on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List.

    Money motivation

    Umlilo Safaris, a South African hunting company, is currently advertising the hunt to clients on behalf of Mabwe Adventures, Joubert confirms. The company boasts how clients can shoot five hippos per trip and keep the animals’ tusks. Each hunter will be charged up to $14 000 for five hippos, according to their Facebook site.

    Banda and the Zambian Tourism Ministry has provided no adequate justification for the cull, spuriously condemning conservation NGO’s for not opposing the actions during a previous hunting spree from 2011 to 2016.


    Source: https://www.eturbonews.com/227854/suspicious-tender-at-heart-of-zambian-hippo-culling-scandal
     
    Tom Hawk likes this.

  2. CAustin

    CAustin AH ENABLER BRONZE SUPPORTER AH Ambassador

    Joined:
    May 7, 2013
    Messages:
    11,358
    Video/Photo:
    101
    Likes Received:
    7,585
    Member of:
    Courtney Hunting Club, NRA Life Member, SCI Kansas City Chapter
    Hunted:
    South Africa, Kalahari, Northwest, Limpopo, Gauteng, APNR Kruger Area. USA Georgia, South Carolina, Arkansas, New Mexico, North Carolina and Texas
    Interesting read. Thanks for sharing.
     

  3. BRICKBURN

    BRICKBURN AH ENABLER SUPER MODERATOR CONTRIBUTOR LIFETIME TITANIUM BENEFACTOR AH Ambassador

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    19,030
    Video/Photo:
    414
    Likes Received:
    10,677
    Hunted:
    Namibia, South Africa, Botswana, Mozambique, Canada, USA, Mexico
    Just for clarification:
    ZAWA is not the Authority for anything in Zambia. ZAWA was disbanded or shut down. DNPW is the authority regarding wildlife now.
    Apparently, given the past tense of the commentary, Dr. Chomba did not make it on the rehire list at DNPW???

    Do you wonder what a "program" of culling on an ongoing basis might do, versus the "one off" event the research referenced is apparently contemplating.
    Ongoing management of the population

    Perhaps, the folks with Outfitting agreements might be able to manage the areas Hippo if provided the opportunity. Culling is always an option or take your hands off like Botswana and allow the Elephant to devastate the area.

    As always, we have to sort through so much chaff in these "news" articles.
     
    Hogpatrol likes this.

  4. mrpoindexter

    mrpoindexter AH Fanatic

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2016
    Messages:
    539
    Video/Photo:
    16
    Likes Received:
    803
    Member of:
    SCI, NFAA
    Hunted:
    Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe, California
    I find this part interesting:
    “The act of culling removes excess males and frees resources for the remaining female individuals, leading to increased births […] rather than suppressing population growth rate”, the scientific and peer-reviewed research states.

    So when we say hunting surplus males won't harm animal populations, the anti's claim it will. When we need to cull, suddenly killing the surplus males will cause the population to grow. Can they really have it both ways?
     
    GuttormG likes this.

  5. enysse

    enysse AH ENABLER AH Ambassador

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    10,475
    Video/Photo:
    102
    Likes Received:
    2,997
    Member of:
    Northeast Wisconsin SCI chapter, Lifetime member of NRA,RMEF
    Hunted:
    Namibia, South Africa (East Cape, Guateng and Limpopo)
    A very interesting article. I always thought it would be best for the Zambian outfitters to equally share the excess hippos equally. It would give outfitters something else to market to foreign hunters and put money back into the community.
     

  6. mrpoindexter

    mrpoindexter AH Fanatic

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2016
    Messages:
    539
    Video/Photo:
    16
    Likes Received:
    803
    Member of:
    SCI, NFAA
    Hunted:
    Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe, California
    I agree, but the scheduling may well be difficult if they can only handle a maximum of two hippos per day at their processing location. I could imagine that would be a problem if you had 4-10 different outfitters sharing the quota and trying to schedule multiple hunters on different safaris. I would hate to be on a hunt and get a call at 10am telling me two hippos have already been shot by a couple other hunters and my hunting day is over.
     

Share This Page

 
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice