Study On Persuasive Hunting Arguments

Discussion in 'Articles' started by 686, Jan 17, 2018.

  1. 686

    686 AH Senior Member

    Oct 18, 2017
    Likes Received:

    I posted this in the Trophy thread, but I didn't see the info anywhere else and thought it might be good to post on its own:

    Regarding game management models and "antis" attitudes, there was a study done in the US that looked at what changed anti-hunters attitudes towards hunting. I believe the only successful arguments were:

    A. That all the meat is utilized and the animal isn't wasted.
    B. That hunting is a necessary activity licensed and regulated by states to manage wild animal populations appropriately.

    Nothing else worked. Not "we've done it for years, I grew up doing it," etc. (Source: Episode 53 of the MeatEater Podcast; I believe the study was done by PhD candidate Greg Blascovich - definitely worth a listen if you have time:

    I think we are at a bit of a turning point on the issue of hunting in public opinion (at least in the US). A big percentage of the younger "millenial" generation is interested in food quality/sourcing/organics/free-range stock, etc. and has realised two facts: 1. Game meat is healthier and more "organic" and "sustainable" than farmed beef/chicken; and 2. The hypocritical nature of eating meat and being anti-hunting. (I.e., if you eat a hamburger or chicken nugget, you have just as much blood on your hands as a big game hunter, hunters just don't completely rely on other people do their "dirty work" for them)

    Regarding African hunting, I think the "if it pays it stays" argument should be added as well (when the animal has value to the local impoverished community, it is protected and managed, when it is a drain on the resources of the local impoverished community, it will be poached). I think Trophy did a decent job illustrating this fact, mostly with the Maasai segment, I wish they would have gone into more exposition when the locals were discussing Philip's elephant, and how they wished more would be hunted.

    We're probably never going to change the minds of a lot of vegans or "bleeding-heart" animal rights folks, but that's ok, we just need the rational middle-ground folks to see that what we do is much more authentic, responsible, and necessary than it is often portrayed to be. It also helps to note that hunting revenue pays for all of the state Game and Fish agencies in the US, and provides millions to the wildlife agencies in Africa as well as anti-poaching.

    Hunting, especially African hunting is such a complicated topic, but having those talking points in mind may be a good way to educate and change the attitudes of the middle-ground folks.

  2. firehuntfish

    firehuntfish AH Fanatic

    Sep 3, 2009
    Likes Received:
    South Florida
    Member of:
    Namibia, Botswana, South Africa, USA, South, Central America & New Zealand
    I like Rinella a lot... I don't agree with 100% of his views, but overall, I think he is an excellent representative of the blue-collar hunting community. The exchange in this video in particular is, in my opinion, one of the strongest arguments made on behalf the hunters' perspective. Rinella not only presents facts to support his views, he does it in a very credible, even charming demeanor. He slam dunks this guy, and has the guy thanking him for it at the end of the video.

    686 likes this.

  3. ScottG

    ScottG AH Fanatic

    Mar 18, 2014
    Likes Received:
    I agree. Steve responds with a level head and intellect. I also like his show because it's not a 30 minute infomercial for his sponsors.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice