Vintageguy
AH fanatic
I get all this speculation on why A-Frames are so limited but the people buying bullets are not the types who will just jump back and forth from brand to brand on availability. As far as commercially loaded ammo goes, I won’t use it to hunt with and when I do buy a box, it’s for the brass. I spend a lot of time working up loads and I shoot a lot more than the average guy buying a box of cartridges for his big game rifle at Walmart. I think that’s probably the norm for most serious handloaders. I have loads for Barnes that are wicked accurate. Mostly because they are always available and don’t mind target shooting with them because I can always order more and they’re about the same price. Not so with A-frames. I fire very few of them, reserving them for hunting. That’s the lighter calibers too. My 375 likes them but also shoots Barnes great. My 458 loves Barnes 450 grain TSX bullets and shoots them in the same hole as 500 A-frames. But 90 percent of my shooting is, again, with Barnes. So, while I’m loading and shooting newly purchased Barnes, my A-frames will be gaining a patina of age on the shelf. If Swifts were available, I wouldn’t have the multiple boxes of Barnes on my bench in the first place. When people ask me what bullet to load I recommend Barnes and if I mention Swift, it’s with the caveat of availability. The target was a sighting in session with a newly mounted Trijicon scope on a Winchester Model 70 in 458. The final 3 on the top of the bullseye are Barnes, the 3 directly under are Barnes with a 500 A-frame. Yeah, I ask myself all the time, why do I bother with Swift.