SwampTrooper
AH veteran
Boyd’s stocks have their detractors but they are convenient and typically fairly priced and affordable for someone like me. However, they are chunky with redundant wood almost everywhere. Your rifle feels more like a boat oar rather than a refined sporting rifle if you just drop them in. That being the case, they are workable. I have a classic Boyd’s stock that I used as a base for bedding, floating, a new ebony tip and cross bolt plugs, heavily thinned the forend, re-contoured to a taper, stained, hand finished, and checkered. It came with me to Africa and took some plains game. You do a lot of work to get the stock looking good, it’s a shame and almost insulting they give you a surcharge to leave it unfinished. Anyways, I’m building a new gun in left hand for my dad and am looking again at Boyd’s because I don’t have the time to learn to carve out my own blanks. On my own Boyd’s I never contoured the butt end of the gun and it has always bothered me. You can see how rounded and bulging the cheek piece is. The grip angle just seems clunky, and again, there’s just too much material. I have a sentimental attachment to it as one of my early projects but my skills have improved and want to do better next time. I took a photo and drew over it to simulate reshaping, knowing that material can only be removed, not added, to create an improved design to my eye. I’ll post the photos here for your thoughts and reflections, but more importantly, has anyone turned a Boyd’s stock into something more sporting? Surely some of you must have. Ironically the owner of Boyd’s has been getting into African hunting and has been popping up on YouTube. I almost want to write them an email that they really need a design that fits a classical safari rifle but he’s a very successful businessman and my advice would likely go right in the dustbin where it belongs. But, if you have great-grandpa’s Rigby with a broken stock, why would you ever chose any shape that Boyd’s currently offers?
Last edited: