Kreighoff Classic Big Five

TOBY458

AH elite
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
1,737
Reaction score
2,718
Location
Madison Georgia, USA
Media
178
Articles
2
Hunting reports
Africa
3
After my last Buffalo excursion, I feel myself wanting another double rifle. After a lot of research, I keep coming back to the Kreighoff. I like the idea of the cocking safety feature, and the anti doubling feature as well. I had a Merkel 140 in 470 NE at one time that I had great results with, but for some reason I'm kind of stuck on the Kreighoff at this time. Thinking 450/400 or 470, but a 500 isn't out of the question.
Talk me into or out of this rifle. And what caliber would you prefer?
 

MMAL

Gold supporter
AH enthusiast
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
495
Reaction score
642
Location
New Jersey
Media
21
Hunting reports
Africa
2
Hunted
New Jersey, New York, Wyoming, Colorado, Mexico, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Northwest Territories, Newfoundland, Namibia
I have the 500/416 ne. Love it you’re screwed if you think people on this site are gonna stop you from buying a gun. Now if you said you were stuck on a kreighoff with extractors in the only caliber worth having which is ****. Then you would get some negative comments. Good luck
 

Red Leg

Lifetime bronze benefactor
AH ambassador
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
5,314
Reaction score
12,965
Location
Texas Hill Country
Media
261
Articles
5
Hunting reports
Africa
2
USA/Canada
3
Mex/S.Amer
1
Europe
3
Member of
SCI DSC life memberships / NRA Patron Life
Hunted
Mexico, Namibia, RSA, Germany, Austria, Argentina, Canada, Mozambique, Spain, US (15 states)
Great rifle! The 470 or 500/416 will do anything the 500 will without needing a gun carriage.
 

TOBY458

AH elite
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
1,737
Reaction score
2,718
Location
Madison Georgia, USA
Media
178
Articles
2
Hunting reports
Africa
3
Great rifle! The 470 or 500/416 will do anything the 500 will without needing a gun carriage.
Is the 500 a heavier gun in the same model? I figure the Kreighoff was like most other rifles, in that the larger bores were actually lighter. Are the barrels heavier on the 500?
 

Bushpig4Ever

AH enthusiast
Joined
Sep 12, 2017
Messages
429
Reaction score
672
Location
South Africa
Media
46
Member of
Custodians
Hunted
Germany, Slovenia, Sardinia, England, Namibia, Zimbabwe, South Africa
I would rather purchase a Krieghoff By the way I have got one, however 'only‘ in 9,3x74R.
 

Ridgewalker

Lifetime bronze benefactor
AH ambassador
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
6,082
Reaction score
6,772
Location
Colorado
Media
229
Hunting reports
Africa
3
USA/Canada
3
Hunted
South Africa: Limpopo, Northwest; USA: Ak, Mt, Wy, Co, Ne, Ks, Nv, NM, Tx
I’ve read that if you’re only going up to buffalo, the 450/400 is the way to go, but if you're wanting it to handle elephant, then go on up to the 470.
I’m thinking I could handle a 450/400, but not sure I could control a 470 and up. That said, you’re a lot younger and stronger than me. Hmmm...maybe I should stand there and let you stop my elephant?(n);)
 

Pondoro

AH fanatic
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
809
Reaction score
986
Media
80
Articles
1
Hunted
Norway, Sweden, Namibia and Botswana
It boils down to what you expect to hunt...for buffalo a 450/400 is a good option with pleasant recoil..it will also suffice for the odd elephant...a buddy took an elephant in Zim with a 1906 vintage 450/400 Jeffery top lever hammergun...no problem..

However...if you plan to hunt elephant extensively take the .470 or even better a .500..

I have a Big Five in .470...love the extra safety built in, ie that you can carry a loaded non-cocked rifle...not sure about the other calibers but my .470 balance like the old brit doubles...something I prefer. Some german double rifles tend to be front heavy...something I dislike..
 

Opposite Pole

AH fanatic
Joined
Jun 6, 2017
Messages
997
Reaction score
1,192
Location
Warsaw & Sydney
Media
91
Member of
SSAA; PZŁ, KŁ Sęp
Hunted
Australia, Poland
I’ve got the K Gun in 470 and 9.3x74R. I love mine. I’ve shot 500 at the factory also, the recoil didn’t feel all that different but it “pushed” you further slowing down the return on the target a bit more than the 470.
 

perttime

AH enthusiast
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
421
Reaction score
326
Media
1
...
I have a Big Five in .470...love the extra safety built in, ie that you can carry a loaded non-cocked rifle.....
Some are concerned about the hunter forgetting to cock the rifle when they need to shoot. I suppose practice helps with that.
 

AZDAVE

AH elite
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
1,650
Reaction score
2,111
Media
156
Hunting reports
Africa
3
Hunted
South Africa, Alaska,lower 48
I have handled the K-guns a number of times, but haven't bought one yet. (Booked another hunt with the $'s available)

I like the safety on them and it wouldn't take but a few sessions of practice for it to become second nature. The 450/400 is just a great round that as others have said is about perfect for buffalo and good on an occasional elephant. If you just want something bigger the 470 or 500 will do the trick, with ammo easier to find than the 500/416. But the 500/416 is a great bridge in the gap of the 450/400 and it's bigger brothers. You really can't go wrong with any of the choices. I am sure none of my ramblings helped:ROFLMAO:

You could buy the K-gun and a couple month’s later trade me for it:)
 

BeeMaa

AH legend
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
2,106
Reaction score
2,823
Location
Eastern US
Media
78
Hunting reports
Africa
1
Member of
NRA Life Member, SCI
Hunted
Eastern US & RSA
The Krieghoff is an amazing double and the one I would choose above all others.
Although there is a lot to be said about spending the $ on a hunt over the rifle.
Depends on how passionately you really feel about either the rifle or the hunt.

As for caliber, I've alway been fond of the 500/416.
Big enough for all comers although availabity is a very real issue.
 

Foxi

AH elite
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
1,525
Reaction score
2,467
Location
Germany
Media
176
Articles
6
Hunting reports
Africa
4
Hunted
Canada, USA,Austria,Turkey,Tschech Rep.,Poland,Hungary,Serbia,Denmark,Khomas HL and Omaheke/Namibia and England(England is wonderful) Romania,Luangwa/Zambia-,Gwayi/Zimbabwe/- + Save/Zimbabwe/- River. Horseback-tours in South Africa and Botswana.
beautiful,isn't it ?
the Krieghoff Big Five.
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:

CAustin

Bronze supporter
AH ambassador
Joined
May 7, 2013
Messages
14,108
Reaction score
11,112
Media
252
Hunting reports
Africa
7
Member of
Courtney Hunting Club, NRA Life Member, SCI Kansas City Chapter
Hunted
South Africa, KwaZulu Natal, Kalahari, Northwest, Limpopo, Gauteng, APNR Kruger Area. USA Georgia, South Carolina, Arkansas, New Mexico, North Carolina and Texas
After my last Buffalo excursion, I feel myself wanting another double rifle. After a lot of research, I keep coming back to the Kreighoff. I like the idea of the cocking safety feature, and the anti doubling feature as well. I had a Merkel 140 in 470 NE at one time that I had great results with, but for some reason I'm kind of stuck on the Kreighoff at this time. Thinking 450/400 or 470, but a 500 isn't out of the question.
Talk me into or out of this rifle. And what caliber would you prefer?
yes go with the 470! That way we can go hunt buffalo together and both have ammo if something goes wrong traveling across the water!
 

CAustin

Bronze supporter
AH ambassador
Joined
May 7, 2013
Messages
14,108
Reaction score
11,112
Media
252
Hunting reports
Africa
7
Member of
Courtney Hunting Club, NRA Life Member, SCI Kansas City Chapter
Hunted
South Africa, KwaZulu Natal, Kalahari, Northwest, Limpopo, Gauteng, APNR Kruger Area. USA Georgia, South Carolina, Arkansas, New Mexico, North Carolina and Texas

Philip Glass

Lifetime bronze benefactor
AH legend
Joined
Feb 26, 2015
Messages
3,167
Reaction score
4,957
Location
Texas
Website
www.dorper.net
Media
80
Articles
11
Hunting reports
Africa
8
USA/Canada
2
Asia/M.East
2
Member of
NRA, Life SCI, Life DSC, Life EWA
Hunted
RSA, Namibia, Zimbabwe, Cameroon, Mongolia, Kyrgyzstan, Austria, Australia, TX, NM
After my last Buffalo excursion, I feel myself wanting another double rifle. After a lot of research, I keep coming back to the Kreighoff. I like the idea of the cocking safety feature, and the anti doubling feature as well. I had a Merkel 140 in 470 NE at one time that I had great results with, but for some reason I'm kind of stuck on the Kreighoff at this time. Thinking 450/400 or 470, but a 500 isn't out of the question.
Talk me into or out of this rifle. And what caliber would you prefer?
I bought the .470 last year. I had some try to direct me to the 450/500 and all tried to talk me out of the .500. I am happy with it for some of the reasons you mention. The safety is fantastic and very functional. I know it’s just too weird for the English crowd. Every time there is a big bore shoot what do you hear about the most? Huh? It’s how many people doubled in front of everyone! The Kreighoff can’t double fire due to the ingenious design. I just put the Kahles red dot sight on mine. Ready to go on another hunt with it, soon I hope.
Go for the K gun you won’t be disappointed.
Regards,
Philip
 

One Day...

Gold supporter
AH elite
Joined
Jan 7, 2018
Messages
1,088
Reaction score
2,334
Website
www.huntershillsafaris.co.za
Media
326
Hunting reports
Africa
3
Member of
PHASA
Hunted
Europe, America, Canada, Africa
I shoot the K gun in .470 TOBY458, so I am obviously biased. Mine was custom ordered with a blued action. I really dislike the nickel plating to begin with, and even more when it starts chipping away :A Ill:

But I will try to be objective.

Regarding caliber...

To each their own!

I fully acknowledge the popularity of the .40+ cal double rifles, but I do not differentiate between buff or elephant, I differentiate between "killing" and "stopping".

I suspect that like the .404 Jeffery bolt action rifles, the 450/400 doubles are popular because they are stepping into big bore territory, while still providing mid-bore recoil. Are they great killers? Absolutely! Are they great "stoppers"? No.
Apparently they have always lacked the frontal area of larger calibers, the bullet weight, and the raw power to fully belong to the club. Most pros for the last hundred years - I mean the pros with literally thousands of elephants and buffalo to their individual credit - have argued that a .45+ caliber 500 gr bullet delivering 5,000 ft/lbs of energy is the right minimal recipe for a charge stopper. The 450/400 delivers a .40 caliber 400 gr bullet at 4,000 ft/lbs. It is simply not enough for a "stopper." Pretty good for a DG rifle, but not for a "stopper."

Like the .416 Rigby (and all its modern derivatives trying to copy it in shorter cases, albeit at significantly higher pressure), the 500/.416 bridges the gap between the .375 and the .45. In so many words, it almost (but not quite) delivers a .450 / .458 / .470 punch (albeit with less frontal area and less energy: 40 cal and 4,700 ft/lbs), with almost the ballistic trajectory of a .375. It can handle a charge (although not being the best at it) and it can still shoot plains game at 200 yards (although not being the best at it), but in which case it really needs to be scoped.
As much as I left the .375 H&H bolt action bandwagon for the .416 Rigby bandwagon, I really am not interested in the 500/416. I am not really sure what the .416 Rigby trajectory does for a by-definition close quarter rifle such as a double. Sure, scoping it helps bridging that gap, but it still will not shoot as accurately as a bolt action at 200 yards, and it will not stop as well as a .450 / .458 / .470 / .500 at close range. A solution in search of a problem?

My personal take is that if someone is going to spend $15,000 to $20,000 (or more) on a double rifle, for that money one would want a dual purpose killer/stopper double. That means a .450 / .470 / .500.

The difference between .450 / .470 / .500 is small enough that I would have bought either of the three, had there been a financial incentive. It ended up being a .470 because that there was nothing to save with a .450 or .500, and .470 ammo is SO MUCH easier to find...

Regarding the safety / cocking mechanism...

The answer is in two parts, because the cocking system acts as both a cocker/decocker and a safety:

1) It is objectively not as easy and unobtrusive to switch ON/OFF as a regular safety is (you need to exert a certain pressure to coil the strikers' springs), so if you are in the habit of switching automatically the safety on/off as you mount/dismount a shotgun or double rifle to your shoulder, it is not as smooth as a traditional safety. I appreciated this smoothness on my previous double, a traditional pre-WWII Jules Burry 450 #2.

2) It is objectively immensely safer than a regular trigger-locking safety when carrying the gun, especially in single file, when muzzle safety can be challenging, because the gun can be fully loaded while fully safe (uncocked), even more so than a firing pin-locking safety (e.g. Mauser or Winchester "3 positions safety," Weatherby safety, etc.) makes a bolt action as close to fully safe as possible while loaded.

Overall, I feel unquestionably safer along the hunt with this system, but I DID have to acquire a new muscle memory reflex to cock it as I mount the gun.

A third part to the answer, is to clarify that contrarily to what has been said by some, when the Kreighoff cocker has been cocked, it remains in the cocked position, even when the gun is opened and reloaded, so there is no requirement to recock the gun after it is opened (as I believe the Blaser S2 requires). Reloads are therefore entirely identical to those with traditional guns: break open, flick the empties out, drop two fresh shells, close, aim, shoot. Or if you do not need to shoot again, you can then decock any time you later want.

So, in summary: it is different; it works; like everything new, it needs to be learned; and, in my view, it is an improvement. I never felt comfortable resting my two hands on top of the muzzles of my .450 #2 - and I always cringe when I see someone do it and trust 100% the trigger safety of their fully loaded double - but I would now feel safe resting my hands on top of my uncocked Kreighoff .470 ... if it was not bad muzzle safety discipline anyway :)
 
Last edited:

Bushpig4Ever

AH enthusiast
Joined
Sep 12, 2017
Messages
429
Reaction score
672
Location
South Africa
Media
46
Member of
Custodians
Hunted
Germany, Slovenia, Sardinia, England, Namibia, Zimbabwe, South Africa
The name of the company is KRIEGHOFF, that‘s why the rifle is called KRIEGHOFF CLASSIC BIG FIVE.

Odd, people are interested in a gun from Krieghoff company but unable to spell the name properly.

What about Vilkswagen, Morcedes, BMV, Tramp etc ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: IvW
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

pamtnman wrote on Timothy Doyle's profile.
Interested in the 450/400 dies. I have PayPal. Thank you
ve7poi wrote on ZANA BOTES SAFARI's profile.
See you in May 2022
twenty days with you time seems to have slowed now after booking lol
tarbe wrote on Royal27's profile.
Current ETA to Buc-ees is 11 am or we can meet you there about 2 hrs later in the way back.
On the ocean or in the bush .
 
Top