Inefficiency Of Evolutionarily Relevant Selection In Ungulate Trophy Hunting

NamStay

AH fanatic
Joined
Dec 18, 2015
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,588
Media
106
Articles
279
full



Inefficiency of Evolutionarily Relevant Selection in Ungulate Trophy Hunting

Differentially harvesting individual animals with specific traits has led some to argue that such selection can cause evolutionary change that may be detrimental to the species, especially if those traits are related positively to individual fitness. Most hunters are not selective in the type of animal they take, satisfied
instead to harvest any legal animal. In a few exceptions, however, regulations may limit hunters to harvest animals of a minimum size or age regardless of their personal choice. Using information from a broad range of aquatic and terrestrial systems exposed to a myriad of potential and operational selective pressures, several authors have made expansive generalizations about selective harvest and its applicability to ungulates. Harvest-based selection can potentially be intensive enough to be relevant in an evolutionary sense, but phenotypic changes consistent with hunter selection are otherwise confounded with multiple environmental influences. Factors such as age, genetic contribution of females, nutrition, maternal effects, epigenetics, patterns of mating success, gene linkage, gene flow, refugia, date of birth, and other factors affecting selection interact with harvest to impede unidirectional evolution of a trait. The intensity of selection determines potential for evolutionary change in a meaningful temporal framework. Indeed, only under severe intensity, and strict selection on a trait, could human harvest prompt evolutionary changes in that trait. Broad generalizations across populations or ecological systems can yield erroneous extrapolations and inappropriate
assumptions. Removal of males expressing a variety of horn or antler sizes, including some very large males, does not inevitably represent directional artificial selection unless the selective pressures are intensive enough to cause a unidirectional shift in allele frequencies that may act on some relevant life-history trait or process. Here I review the topic of harvest-based selection in male ungulates and discuss the inefficiency of trophy hunting in changing genetic expression of phenotype.

© 2017 The Wildlife Society.
© The Journal of Wildlife Management


22528090_839984946161285_5834594834089062463_n.jpg
22529052_839985092827937_5665036939842042726_o.jpg
22550456_839985289494584_2138164432490657862_o.jpg
22548731_839985392827907_340084407894002964_o.jpg
22528713_839985482827898_7167588554055728217_o.jpg
22519914_839985566161223_3152829000820909070_o.jpg
22519728_839985696161210_8445018164058831875_o.jpg
22528758_839985812827865_5351874745904587677_o.jpg
22528919_839985909494522_2256960992945113483_o.jpg
22499322_839986006161179_4817151395807377117_o.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Heffelfinger-2017-The_Journal_of_Wildlife_Management.pdf
    122 KB · Views: 135
Here is proof that scientists and wild life biologists know for certain that Trophy Hunting has no effect on the evolutionary development of a species. Even though this treatise is dealing with white tailed deer I suspect the findings hold true for all game / wild animals.
 
This one will take a while to get through. Thanks for sharing.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
54,087
Messages
1,145,393
Members
93,582
Latest member
profibrahim
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Nick BOWKER HUNTING SOUTH AFRICA wrote on EGS-HQ's profile.
Hi EGS

I read your thread with interest. Would you mind sending me that PDF? May I put it on my website?

Rob
85lc wrote on Douglas Johnson's profile.
Please send a list of books and prices.
Black wildebeest hunted this week!
Cwoody wrote on Woodcarver's profile.
Shot me email if Beretta 28 ga DU is available
Thank you
 
Top