Mike B
AH enthusiast
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 348
- Reaction score
- 759
- Location
- Texas
- Website
- www.bazarsolutions.com
- Media
- 40
- Articles
- 2
- Member of
- DSC - Lifetime Member, NRA
- Hunted
- South Africa, Argentina, US (TX, NM, SD), Botswana
Reading is fundamental... Paragraph #6: "Even with the ban lifted, the male elephant had protected status as a research elephant after the non-governmental organization (NGO) Elephants Without Borders collared it."A bit more information would be helpful, instead of an inflammatory headline.
Reading is fundamental... Paragraph #6: "Even with the ban lifted, the male elephant had protected status as a research elephant after the non-governmental organization (NGO) Elephants Without Borders collared it."
Paragraph #7: ""Killing of collared animals is not permitted under any circumstances," the Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources Conservation, and Tourism said in a statement Thursday."
Convenient that article comes out in US news just days after DSC files a suit over elephant imports
It looks like it just happened yesterday (the ruling). Not sure when the actual shooting happened.
The timing sucks for sure, but the truth is the antis don’t care, they are a bit rabid in their train of thought anyway. No rational debates to be had with 90% of them.
Now for the destruction of the elephant's collar, as mentioned in the Fox news article
This article has more holes in it than one of my 100 yard targets.
Shouldn't the responsibility
fall upon the officer from the Dept of Wildlife and National Parks?.
" Unless the Department of Wildlife and National Parks officer wanted to cover his ass as well?