Ten years ago i would have agreed with you ....till my son (Marine) came home from Afganastan disabled and unable to keep hunting without using these methods .
The Subway sandwiches I get, never look like the ones they make in the T.V commercials
It was my Courtney boots he threatened to take away! He should be able to amass quite a collection of boots I would think, maybe a second store at KMG in the future
Was looking at old posts and saw this. It chaps my ass to no end. I will say as a manufacturer of Title II guns (SBRs and cans, MGs and SBSs) cans are by legal definition either “silencers” or “firearm mufflers”. Suppressor is a term made up by the shooting community. That being said, I k ow exactly what you mean and I use the term suppressor unless it is on govt paperwork that I send to the ATF.The media calling an AR-15 an "Assault Weapon"
Calling magazines, clips.
Calling suppressors, silencers.
Haven’t thought of it that way to be honest. Makes total sense though. “Harvest” instead of kill was maybe to be more PC, but let’s face it, the anti-hunting kooks aren’t going to change, so like you say, let’s call it what it is
I don' believe in accepting everything anyone else does. As hunters, we have a code of honor to follow. Things that are legal are not always honorable. Some codes of honor can be personal (self- imposed range which game is shot at or the type of game taken etc.) But some are points are honor reflecting for our fraternity- skybusting ducks and geese is legal but hardly ethical. Most hunters know how this works. Every hunt camp has camp rules regarding what is right and wrong- you might break the rules once while you are new, but break them again, and you are not invited back the next year.
www.africahunting.com
