DSC Supports EPA Action To Rescind Pebble Veto Due To New Mine Plan

Hoas

AH fanatic
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
952
Reaction score
2,532
Media
603
Articles
276
burrr.jpg



DSC agrees with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) settlement with the Pebble Partnership that rescinds its 2014 “Proposed Determination.” This step will not guarantee or prejudge a particular outcome, but allows the operator of the mine to present a plan to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and undergo a rigorous environmental, economic and social impact review process under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) – an action afforded to all other extractive resource projects in the United States.

On October 12, 2017, the Pebble Project introduced a new and smaller mine plan with enhanced environmental safeguards. This plan is smaller in scope, and its footprint and operating plan is very different from any of the previously discussed proposals.

“Pebble listened to the concerns of groups like ours, and we appreciate it. So will the wildlife and the environment,” said DSC President Craig Nyhus. “The project should be able to be presented without a preemptive determination against it, but as DSC pointed out in its Open Letter sent in May, the potential impacts to wildlife and local economies should be closely examined when considering this or similar projects in the future.”

According to Pebble, the plan improves the safeguards for the tailings impoundment and it will not have waste rock piles. There will be no cyanide plant at the site or any mine facilities in the Upper Talarik Drainage. The mine proposes to benefit the local communities by producing low-cost power for the region and providing revenue sharing for local Alaskan native communities.

Since 1972, DSC has been the gathering point for hunters, conservationists and wildlife enthusiasts, and an essential part of its mission is to conserve wildlife and wilderness lands. The Bristol Bay watershed is an area of exceptional ecological value with salmon fisheries unrivaled anywhere in North America. DSC is committed to the principles of the Clean Water Act, NEPA and the Endangered Species Act — as well as the right to due process.

DSC is not opposed to mining, and believes that mining and clean water can coexist. DSC also understands that mining in America must meet some of the most stringent environmental requirements in the world. In Alaska, mining helps promote diverse economic opportunities for Alaska natives and rural communities, like the Red Dog mine owned by the NANA Corporation (an Alaskan native owned corporation). In addition, DSC also realizes that the U.S. needs to develop its own strategic minerals as opposed to being reliant on foreign countries for such products.

DSC agrees that it is only fair that the Pebble Project be able to present its new mine plan to prove they can operate it safely under federal and state laws and regulations. The EPA’s “Proposed Determination” to preemptively block Pebble from the NEPA permit evaluation process was based on analysis of information that is no longer relevant or accurate. Thus, one cannot fairly base what is essentially a pre-permit veto determination on that data.

As DSC said in its statement of May 22, 2017, the organization urges that the potential impacts to wildlife and local economies be closely scrutinized. DSC urges policy makers to ensure laws and regulations fairly treat all applicants for federal permits and that the EPA or any federal agency should not pre-determine an outcome when there is a well-established statutory process, like NEPA.


Source: http://dscnewscenter.org/2017/11/ds...-to-rescind-pebble-veto-due-to-new-mine-plan/
 
The bear pictured needs to eat a lot of fish and fatten up.
 
If DSC thinks mining and clean water can coexist...they failed chemistry class.
 
Wrong, clean resource extraction and clean water can coexist. Eliminate water runoff, and waste pools, this can prevent downstream contamination. Regular water sampling down stream can catch heavy metal seepage early. EPA regulation applied fairly, as it was intended works to protect the environment. It’s downfall has been the bastardization the liberals have done to it for three decades. There is a new sheriff in town.
Severe penalties for violations, and rewards for compliance are the keys to safety
 
Your new sheriff has sold out the environment...and the head of the EPA couldn't get a job checking the water quality at the municipal swimming pool.
 
The EPA has reverted to "best available technology" vs a clean water standard. The net result is that the developers of the Pebble mines are NOT required to meet a certain water quality level (I.e., clean water) that is set BEFORE they mine rather they are required to implement "industry standard" technology. I wouldn't want to live downstream of or eat salmon caught downstream of "industry standard" water treatment.
 
Ah a true liberal can never be silent, stop trolling hunting sites, and go back to the PETA rally
 
Sorry dude...I am a deer killing machine!
 
Agree with you Scott- you are not the Lone Ranger here. Anyone who arbitrarily knee jerks approval of this change in attitude or policy toward a foreign owned open pit GOLD mine for Pete's sake needs to dig deep and get all the history, facts and background info before blindly jumping on the current admins' band wagon!! If it were a national security or critical US based energy project or some such maybe there would be room for discussion but the Pebble Mine couldn't be farther from that! Kinda of like considering approval of a Chinese rare earth mineral strip mine or hardwood logging plan somewhere in Africa because the Chinese applied some lipstick to the mitigation plan and promised investment in future eco-safaris in the area !!!
 
Last edited:
If the mine were somewhere else in the state I wouldn't have a problem at all. Heck, we have some pretty major gold mines, cool. But this mine has the potential of making the Mount Polley failure seem like childs play. And Mount Polley proved those supposedly fail safe tailing ponds can and do fail poisoning salmon streams ans rivers along with people along the rivers and sending heavy metals into the ocean. Heck they didn't even need an earthquake for the Polley Mountain failure, and Alaska known for those. Pebble Mine wouldn't be at the headwaters of just one salmon bearing river, it would be an entire region. The Bristol Bay watershed is the most important salmon fishing area in my state. Never mind crab, cod, pollock and flatfish that are fished in the bay. Do you like to eat any of those? So I am in full agreement with Scott and have been since the mine was proposed.
 
The EPA has reverted to "best available technology" vs a clean water standard. The net result is that the developers of the Pebble mines are NOT required to meet a certain water quality level (I.e., clean water) that is set BEFORE they mine rather they are required to implement "industry standard" technology. .......

Ah a true liberal can never be silent, stop trolling hunting sites, and go back to the PETA rally



Name calling? o_O

This is your reply to someone questioning the actual meaning of a standard and proposed policy??

@Edward Wright , do you have an answer to the concerns raised then please state them.

spank-kid2.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Forum statistics

Threads
54,066
Messages
1,144,808
Members
93,539
Latest member
AbigailSuh
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Black wildebeest hunted this week!
Cwoody wrote on Woodcarver's profile.
Shot me email if Beretta 28 ga DU is available
Thank you
Pancho wrote on Safari Dave's profile.
Enjoyed reading your post again. Believe this is the 3rd time. I am scheduled to hunt w/ Legadema in Sep. Really looking forward to it.
check out our Buff hunt deal!
 
Top