.500 Jeffery

USAN

AH fanatic
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
669
Reaction score
379
Deals & offers
2
Media
359
Articles
54
by Terry Wieland

watermark.php


For many years, the .500 Jeffery was the heavyweight champion of magazine-rifle cartridges. Firing a 535-grain bullet at 2,400 fps, it delivered 6,800 ft.lbs. muzzle energy and was not surpassed until the .460 Weatherby in 1958.

For all its brawn, the .500 Jeffery could also lay claim to the title of “most misunderstood” cartridge. It was not a creation of W.J. Jeffery, in spite of the name, but a German design of the 1920s, intended to adapt surplus military Mauser 98 rifles to a serious dangerous-game cartridge.

In Germany, it was known as the 12.5x70mm Schuler, created by the old gunmaking firm of August Schuler. After 1918, with German rifle production restricted by both the Versailles treaty and fearful economic conditions, gunmakers built rifles on whatever actions they could find. Since military Mauser 98s were plentiful, Schuler set out to design a genuine elephant cartridge that could be squeezed into a standard 98 action.

This explains the .500 Jeffery’s squat shape, short neck, and rebated rim. It fills a K98 action to the absolute limit. Schuler rifles were fitted with straight-line, two- or three-round magazines. At eight or nine pounds, with slim stocks, the recoil was hideous, but they worked.

Around 1925, W.J. Jeffery, one of London’s premier riflemakers, adopted the cartridge and gave it its English name.

For some years, the only ammunition available was of German manufacture (further evidence it was a German development) but the cartridge established a solid reputation on dangerous game. Its most famous user was Rhodesian hunter C. Fletcher Jamieson, a friend of John (Pondoro) Taylor. Taylor hunted with Jamieson’s .500 Jeffery and gave it a solid endorsement in African Rifles and Cartridges.

If the .500 Jeffery has a drawback, it is the short neck, which does not grip longer, heavier bullets as solidly as a .505 Gibbs. Its rebated rim is another theoretical weak point, with emphasis on theoretical. Because of its original application, overall cartridge length is also restricted, which means that the longer the bullet, the more it must encroach on powder capacity to stay within this length. With all of these factors coming into play, the result is a cartridge that generates considerable pressures, and this must be taken into account in both loading the ammunition and building rifles.

A final consideration is conflicting case dimensions. Possibly because of its dual parentage, early chambers and ammunition were never standardized. older rifles and original ammunition, it’s important to ensure everything fits.

Now, with .500 Jeffery dimensions standardized in modern rifles and ammunition, such problems no longer exist. Newer powders allow more variety in bullet weights and velocities, at acceptable pressures; chambered in longer actions, such as the CZ, there is more leeway in overall cartridge length.

Norma’s .500 Jeffery ammunition is available in both 540-grain solids (in the Professional Guide line) and 570-grain Woodleigh softs and solids. The 540-grain bullets have the .500 Jeffery’s trademark 2400 fps muzzle velocity, while the 570-grain bullets are 2200 fps at the muzzle. This makes the .500 Jeffery slightly more powerful than the .500 Nitro Express, using the bullet that made the .500 NE legendary.

Like the .500 NE and the .505 Gibbs, the .500 Jeffery is so big and powerful, its uses are limited to elephant and, under certain circumstances, Cape buffalo. To make recoil tolerable, rifles should be a minimum of 10 pounds and preferably 11. Because of the hefty recoil, they preclude the use of scopes, which for most hunters make the .500s a short-range proposition. This is fine for elephant, however, because they are always hunted at close range.

In recent years, with production rifles chambered for the .500 Jeffery, it has caught the imagination not just of African professionals and safari hunters, but of Americans intrigued by the idea of the owning “the biggest.” As a result, the ammunition has out-sold the rival .505 Gibbs by about six to one.

Although no exact numbers exist, it is estimated that between its introduction in the 1920s, and the current spate of popularity, no more than 100 rifles were built in each of these two calibers, which means there are far more new rifles chambered for the .500 Jeffery than there are vintage ones. As for ammunition, the three new Norma loads are the best that has ever been available.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Like the .500 NE and the .505 Gibbs, the .500 Jeffery is so big and powerful, its uses are limited to elephant and, under certain circumstances, Cape buffalo. To make recoil tolerable, rifles should be a minimum of 10 pounds and preferably 11. Because of the hefty recoil, they preclude the use of scopes, which for most hunters make the .500s a short-range proposition. This is fine for elephant, however, because they are always hunted at close range."

Not so! We Americans shoot the 500 Jeffery scoped and at whatever game we can!

 

Attachments

  • P1000498.jpg
    P1000498.jpg
    181.3 KB · Views: 545
Thanks for the cool history lesson and info!

I shoot a CZ 505 Gibbs scoped and love it, mostly... I cannot use the pretty Norma ammo unless I scratch it up with sandpaper... Many attribute that to the oft ridiculed feeding of the CZ action but I have seen claims by other manufacturers who exclude nickel plated ammo from their guarantee. I love your ammo for it's looks and various configurations... but I have to hunt with the ugly old brass cases that work in my gun:(
 
Great caliber!
 
Would love to own a .500 Jeffery as well as a .505 Gibbs and a .500 Nitro. I may not ever be able to hunt elephant, but I would find something to use them on.
 
Thanks for the cool history lesson and info!

I shoot a CZ 505 Gibbs scoped and love it, mostly... I cannot use the pretty Norma ammo unless I scratch it up with sandpaper... Many attribute that to the oft ridiculed feeding of the CZ action but I have seen claims by other manufacturers who exclude nickel plated ammo from their guarantee. I love your ammo for it's looks and various configurations... but I have to hunt with the ugly old brass cases that work in my gun:(

Matt is having AHR build a 505 Gibbs on the CZ action. As I recall, the only caveat provided, on the part of AHR, is to use ammunition which does not feature a nickel plated case, for this very reason. Now it may be that the width of the CZ action precludes an ideal stack-up, but maybe nickel plated is just that unpredictable.
 
Matt is having AHR build a 505 Gibbs on the CZ action. As I recall, the only caveat provided, on the part of AHR, is to use ammunition which does not feature a nickel plated case, for this very reason. Now it may be that the width of the CZ action precludes an ideal stack-up, but maybe nickel plated is just that unpredictable.
Yup that is what I was referring to, AHR's caveat.

The nickel cases are just to slippery. I can load 3 and close the bolt on empty, an this is how I normally carry my gun until we are close or the PH tells me to chamber a round. My 505 closes with 3 in the box, but it is damned tight... And when I pull the bolt back with the nickel cases, two will pop right out the top! Likewise if I have one chambered and two remaining in the box, the second one will sometimes pop out when I eject. Especially if done fast. Not a good scenario when hunting DG!

I had the action re-worked by Triple River and it is better, but still not working with the plated cases. Before the work, it did the same thing about half the time with brass cartridges. Matt encouraged me to AHR work on it but they have that disclaimer so it leads me to believe it may not get much better... anxiously waiting for Matt to receive his gun and report back!

I saw a guy on TV rolling his cartridges in the sand to "roughen them up a bit" on TV. And @matt85 suggested the sandpaper. It works but is a pain. On one hand I would have liked to hunt with the 600 grain Woodleigh PP loads from Norma, on the other hand my 525 grain DPX in brass cases were reliably working in my gun and regulating well within MOB with the solids.

I thought it also interesting that the 600 grain Norma's shot 14" high at 100 yards compared to my other loads... This is all factory ammo as I don't reload.

The Norma ammo is great stuff near as I can tell and certainly the prettiest ammo I have! But it won't function in my CZ... I will use it in my RSM.
 
In order for the cartridges to stack properly (505 Gibbs), the magazine would need to be 1.195-1.120 inches wide at the base (tapering, of course, toward the front). I am guessing that with the CZ this is not the case (not possible).

By the way, the proper configuration is important for countering the very problem you describe. However, with the Gibbs (or Jeffrey...any really large case), it's not easy to accomplish with most actions.
 
If any of you have any once fired nickel plated 500 Jeffery cases send me two and I will reload them and try them in my 500 Jeffery and send your cases back nice and shiny (though twice fired lol). I'm guessing they'll feed, but it's just that a guess. Those big 505 Gibbs cases might be a whole different story. Factory ammo is too rich for my blood so I only reload.
 
@colorado Two feed just fine, that one against the follower always stays put in the bottom. It is the middle one when three are loaded, or the top and middle if 3 in the box. The 505's slip out from holding against each other.... I think @CTDolan has it correct, the box is just a bit too narrow for the 505 Gibbs case. I measured my RSM, it started life as 416 Rigby and the rear of the box is about 1.12" and the front is closer to 7/8". @matt85 has my CZ doing load development so can't measure it right now.

I can load 2+1 in the RSM if I open the floor plate and carefully drop it a tad while pushing a 3rd cartridge down enough to fit under the extractor claw and feed it into the chamber. But now way will it hold 3 in the box.... If anyone knows of place to get a custom extended floor plate made, I might want to do that.
 
"If anyone knows of place to get a custom extended floor plate made, I might want to do that." - any decent machine shop could do so, I would think.

With regard to stack-up in the magazine (geometry), think of it in terms of vectors. Too narrow a box = too large a vertical component = cartridges doing just what you mention. Add a slippery nickel case, and the situation just got worse (not due to the vertical component having changed, but that the retarding factor (friction) has dropped).
 
I love these articles on the historic cartridges Norma is posting! Now if only they would make .458 WM in their PH Line.........
 
"If anyone knows of place to get a custom extended floor plate made, I might want to do that." - any decent machine shop could do so, I would think.

With regard to stack-up in the magazine (geometry), think of it in terms of vectors. Too narrow a box = too large a vertical component = cartridges doing just what you mention. Add a slippery nickel case, and the situation just got worse (not due to the vertical component having changed, but that the retarding factor (friction) has dropped).

michaelmerker.com
mmriflemaker.com

(Michael Merker Rifle Maker)

Among other things, he specializes in building Mausers to the old Pre-War African style Express Rifle lines, including steel "drop box" magazines, similar in profile to the old .500 Shuler and .425 Westley Richards Mausers.
 
Last edited:
I completely missed this thread some how!

Wayne at AHR tells me that nickel plated cases are bad news with the 505 Gibbs regardless of your action or who made your firearm. we had a lengthy discussion on what (if any) action would cycle these cases and his firm opinion was that nickel plated cases just weren't suited for these huge cartridges.

@ActionBob have you tried the nickel plated cases in your Ruger 505 Gibbs?

-matt
 
Yea but it only holds 2 so not much of a test. I would use them there before the cz. But good old brass is still best.
 
Last edited:
I will repeat what I said before:

"With regard to stack-up in the magazine (geometry), think of it in terms of vectors. Too narrow a box = too large a vertical component = cartridges doing just what you mention. Add a slippery nickel case, and the situation just got worse (not due to the vertical component having changed, but that the retarding factor (friction) has dropped)."

So yeah, nickel-plated, with regard to an action chambered in any cartridge not designed specifically for (the cartridge in question), is potentially a problem waiting to happen. With regard to feeding issues having to do with MRC's 505 (appealing to a prior post), even though apparently designed specifically for the 505 Gibbs (and then adapted to other cartridges...as opposed to the other way around), I think the issue witnessed (having to do with feeding from the magazine) was mainly a function of incompetency on the part of the manufacturer.
 
@CTDolan you describe the situation exactly. I understand it and my rifle was worked on to Improve it... it may not be perfect yet but it is servicable. With brass cases.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
53,946
Messages
1,141,161
Members
93,268
Latest member
lienminhokvip889
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Because of some clients having to move their dates I have 2 prime time slots open if anyone is interested to do a hunt
5-15 May
or 5-15 June is open!
shoot me a message for a good deal!
dogcat1 wrote on skydiver386's profile.
I would be interested in it if you pass. Please send me the info on the gun shop if you do not buy it. I have the needed ammo and brass.
Thanks,
Ross
Francois R wrote on Lance Hopper's profile.
Hi Lance hope you well. The 10.75 x 68 did you purchase it in the end ? if so are you prepared to part with it ? rgs Francois
 
Top