Results 1 to 4 of 4

Ban on Polar Bear Trade Rejected

This is a discussion on Ban on Polar Bear Trade Rejected within the News forums, part of the AfricaHunting.com category; Good to see that scientific facts and not emotion is still directing the CITES Convention members! World痴 Largest Convention On ...

  1. #1
    Buff-Buster's Avatar
    Buff-Buster is online now AH Elite
    Joined
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,031

    Member of Houston Safari Club, Gulf Coast SCI, SCI International. Rowland Ward, NRA, RMEF, Nort American Hunting Club - Life Member, Texas Trophy Hunters

    Hunted Mozambique, South Africa, (Kwa-Zulu Natal & East Cape), Zimbabwe (Charisa & West Nicholson), U.S.(Texas, New Mexico, LA, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Wyoming & Montana), Canada (Alberta) & Argentina (Cordoba)

    Default Ban on Polar Bear Trade Rejected

    Good to see that scientific facts and not emotion is still directing the CITES Convention members!

    World痴 Largest Convention On Wildlife Trade Rejects Polar Bear Trade Ban
    For Immediate Release: March 7, 2013

    Bangkok, Thailand A six month diplomatic initiative by the U.S. State Department and the Department of the Interior to list the polar bear as an endangered species under Appendix I of CITES failed today. The 178 nations that are Parties to the CITES Convention decided that the U.S. proposal lacked the necessary scientific basis for such a listing and was merely a political move requested by the highest levels of the US government. The stakes involved included the right of indigenous peoples to trade in polar bear and to sustainably use the species as a critical wildlife resource.

    Here in Bangkok at the 16th Conference of the CITES Parties, the U.S. proposal to uplist polar bear to 鄭ppendix I was strongly rejected because polar bear do not meet the biological criteria to justify listing. An Appendix I classification provides the maximum level of protection for a CITES listed species and bans all commercial trade for that species.

    The polar bear has not undergone a marked population decline. The global population is not small it is estimated at 20,000-25,000 individuals. Its area of distribution is not restricted it extends over several million kilometers. These facts are the biological criteria. The joint delegation of the SCI Foundation and SCI presented these facts to many of the 2,000 delegates attending this convention.

    The U.S. proposal was entirely based on speculation that over the next 50 years climate change would lead to the loss of the sea ice, the polar bear痴 habitat. High levels of uncertainty are included in the models used to predict climate change. Plus, lots of things can happen in 50 years; polar bears may adapt and survive, they may find abundant food resources on land, such as seals, even if the sea ice is lost. There are many uncertainties married to the U.S. proposal, which undercuts the scientific integrity of the CITES Convention and exposes the fact that the listing is for political reasons.

    The United States and animal rights groups learned today that politics and emotions were not enough to sway the vote on the polar bear. This lesson should have been learned three years ago at the 15th Meeting of the CITES Parties, when a similar U.S. polar bear proposal was also rejected by a wide margin. Rest assured that CITES is still grounded in principles of sustainable use and science-based decision making.

    In debate on the issue, Greenland, among many other Parties, provided remarks against the U.S. proposal and rightfully expressed concern that the credibility of the CITES Convention was at stake. Greenland was clear in saying that these important decisions should not be based on politics, but science. Similar remarks were made by Inuit representatives from Canada. Canada pointed out all the scientific work that they do for polar bear management, stating 渡owhere is the polar bear studied more than in the Canadian arctic.

    The European Union (EU), which controls the votes of a block of 28 countries, attempted to find a compromise between Canada and the United States. Although the EU did provide a more reasonable and less restrictive alternative proposal, it was also rejected by the Parties.

    Although many countries are concerned about the impacts of climate change, today痴 vote favors good science and sustainable use. International trade was found to not be a threat to the polar bear. The SCI and SCI Foundation delegates are staying alert, though, because the meeting has not concluded and there is still a chance that the issue might get reopened for debate in the final days of the convention.

    Safari Club International Foundation (SCI Foundation) is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization that funds and manages worldwide programs dedicated to wildlife conservation, and outdoor education. Since 2000, SCIF has provided over $50 million to these causes around the world. Visit the SCI Foundation痴 new website at Safari Club International Foundation for more information on how you can contribute to international conservation.

  2. #2
    Safari Afrika's Avatar
    Safari Afrika is online now AH Enthusiast
    Joined
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    314

    Member of PHASA - RMEF

    Hunted South Africa - Botswana - Zimbabwe - USA - Namibia

    Default

    Unfortunately the US State Departments have their own agendas and missions ad do not even adhere to the CITES agreement they sign. This at least is some good news in a hunting world constantly having to defend sustainable utilization !
    Richard Lemmer - Safari Afrika - Accept the Challenge !
    www.safariafrika.net
    richard@safariafrika.net
    Skype : safari.afrika

  3. #3
    enysse's Avatar
    enysse is online now AH Ambassador
    Joined
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    5,192

    Member of Northeast Wisconsin SCI chapter, Lifetime member of NRA,RMEF

    Hunted Namibia, South Africa (East Cape, Guateng and Limpopo)

    enysse has no Articles
    View enysse's Photos

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Safari Afrika View Post
    Unfortunately the US State Departments have their own agendas and missions ad do not even adhere to the CITES agreement they sign. This at least is some good news in a hunting world constantly having to defend sustainable utilization !
    THE USFW department is a joke, a bunch of anti-hunters.

  4. #4
    BRICKBURN's Avatar
    BRICKBURN is online now SUPER MODERATOR
    Joined
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,270

    Member of KZN Hunters Assoc

    Hunted Namibia (Otavi, Ozondjache) South Africa ( LP, KZN, NC, EC) Botswana (Ghanzi) Canada (BC, AB, SK, MB, Ont, PQ, NS) USA (MT, WA, SD, CA, CO, WY, KS, MN, NC, VG, UT, HI)

    BRICKBURN has no Articles
    View BRICKBURN's Photos

    Default

    Emotion took the fur trade from the Inuit (et al) and seal hunting from the Newfoundlanders and I am glad that at least the Inuit can still try and make a living from Polar Bears.

    Sounds like Greenland and the Danish should be heading the various Committees.
    Science not politics!
    Practice whispering before you leave for Africa!
    A Legend in my own mind!

Similar Threads

  1. New Brunswick Spring And Fall Trade Show Bear Hunt Special
    By OCB.C. in forum GREAT DEALS on Hunts Worldwide
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-17-2013, 08:21 AM
  2. Looking for Canada Polar Bear deal
    By Ardent in forum GREAT DEALS on Hunts Worldwide
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-30-2012, 05:50 AM
  3. Polar bears
    By Bazz in forum Firearms & Ammunition
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-22-2011, 04:52 AM
  4. Polar Bear Attack
    By AfricaHunting.com in forum Hunting North America
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-23-2010, 11:23 AM
  5. Update on Import of Already Hunted Polar Bears in Canada
    By AfricaHunting.com in forum Hunting North America
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-23-2009, 04:38 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •