Originally Posted by
spoonieduck
In shotguns, I actually prefer side-by-side double guns. In a double shotgun, pinpoint accuracy doesn't matter much because of overlapping patterns. It's an entirely different thing with a double rifle. One of the reasons they are ruinously expensive is because of the technical difficulties of lining up both barrels precisely i.e. making them hit to the same point. Precision accuracy, possible with most well-made [and considerably less expensive] bolt action rifles, is a near impossibility.
Most double rifles are intended to cross bullet paths, usually a fairly close range. Therefore, they would seem to be best suited to hunters looking for potentially charging, dangerous game. The two trigger systems are a potential life saver because a double rifle is essentially two independent rifles. If, during a charge, one barrel fails, the other barrel is instantly ready. There is another advantage over bolt action rifles in quick shooting situations. The hunter must stop and throw the bolt for a second shot. A double rifle man only has to change is finger position a half inch.
Although these rifles are, perhaps, best suited to hunting dangerous game, they are used during driven hunts in parts of Europe. Shooting lanes are usually narrow and the game is moving fast, so speed is a major factor. Also, in parts of Europe--especially when hunting close to others--it is considered good etiquette to have your weapon broken open until you are ready to fire. This so that other hunters can see--at a distance--that your double shotgun or rifle is in a 'safe' position.
Ron